I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2 rubber
strips across the entire road width which you get on either side of a road
bridge.

I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been covered
by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are bridge joints
not really necessary?

John Rowland wrote:
I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2 rubber
strips across the entire road width which you get on either side of a road
bridge.

Expansion Joints (buffer space to take up expasion of beams on hot days)
I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been covered
by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are bridge joints
not really necessary?

If they are just short beams, I'd expect that the 'bricks'would adapt to
fill the space, and voids when cold would not be noticed. (I wonder what
sort of joint is beneath the bricks?)
If this were a 500m beam, I don't think it would be a good solution.

Jim Chisholm

J. Chisholm wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2
rubber strips across the entire road width which you get on either
side of a road bridge.

Expansion Joints (buffer space to take up expasion of beams on hot
days)

I learnt something! I thought they were to stop bridges collapsing in an
earthquake.

I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been
covered by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are
bridge joints not really necessary?

If they are just short beams, I'd expect that the 'bricks'would adapt
to fill the space, and voids when cold would not be noticed. (I
wonder what sort of joint is beneath the bricks?)
If this were a 500m beam, I don't think it would be a good solution.

Thanks.