Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this
evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Stopping all the trains and shutting the stations just seems like the easy way out for LU, and sod the passengers. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Richard J. wrote: Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), When they didn't have radios, they had a guard. It was the move to OPO that - I think - drove the desire to have good comms between motorman and signaller. -- Shenanigans! Shenanigans! Best of 3! -- Flash |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Aug, 01:20, "Richard J." wrote:
There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? *Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? *If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? When mobile reception comes to the tube I guess that you could use a cab mobile as a backup, like the police do. Of course Bob will be out on strike if they suggest that. Or if they don't suggest it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Weaver wrote:
On 16 Aug, 01:20, "Richard J." wrote: There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? You kick the passengers out, run non-stop empty to Green Park and then open the doors and carry on. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:03:42 +0100, John Rowland wrote:
Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? You kick the passengers out, run non-stop empty to Green Park and then open the doors and carry on. Or just reverse in the (double-ended) siding between Hammersmith and Barons Court. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 2:03 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote: Paul Weaver wrote: On 16 Aug, 01:20, "Richard J." wrote: There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? You kick the passengers out, run non-stop empty to Green Park and then open the doors and carry on. You can reverse at Hammersmith Picc only on the east to west via siding and West Kensington both ways. You cannot carry on empty in a single track tunnel with a defective radio unless a second person is also with the train operator or the OPO alarm still transmits. The failure was caused by hardware fault at a connect core site.Radio calls were still being sent to the wrong talk groups (controller) this afternoon. Trains in the open sections did continue in passenger service (at the east end of the District) if Airwave radios are available. There are only a limited number on the network though. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
chunky munky wrote:
On Aug 16, 2:03 pm, "John Rowland" wrote: Paul Weaver wrote: On 16 Aug, 01:20, "Richard J." wrote: There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? You kick the passengers out, run non-stop empty to Green Park and then open the doors and carry on. You can reverse at Hammersmith Picc only on the east to west via siding and West Kensington both ways. You can in fact reverse at Hammersmith west to east also, by departing e/b from the w/b platform and carrying passengers through the siding on to the e/b track. I've done it myself during a weekend closure west of Hammersmith. You cannot carry on empty in a single track tunnel with a defective radio unless a second person is also with the train operator or the OPO alarm still transmits. Were the OPO alarms working after Connect failed yesterday? The failure was caused by hardware fault at a connect core site.Radio calls were still being sent to the wrong talk groups (controller) this afternoon. So 2 complete lines stopped running because of one hardware fault in the radio system. I hope someone high up in LU is asking searching questions about resilience. Trains in the open sections did continue in passenger service (at the east end of the District) if Airwave radios are available. There are only a limited number on the network though. Does anyone know what the rules are on National Rail OPO trains if the cab radio fails? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 3:21 pm, "Richard J." wrote:
chunky munky wrote: On Aug 16, 2:03 pm, "John Rowland" wrote: Paul Weaver wrote: On 16 Aug, 01:20, "Richard J." wrote: There seems to have been a major failure of the Connect radio system this evening (15 Aug), leading to the suspension of the entire District and Circle Lines, plus the H&C west of Baker Street and east of Whitechapel, and the Piccadilly between Green Park and Acton Town. Is it really necessary to shut down lines entirely if the radio system goes down? Am I right in assuming that the tunnel telephone system is still there for emergencies? If so, I would have thought it possible to run a reduced service like the Piccadilly "special timetable" at 5-minute intervals. Even if running in tunnels is considered dangerous (despite it being regarded as perfectly safe without radios for a century or so), why can't a limited service be run on the open sections from Hammersmith or West Kensington to Richmond and Ealing Broadway? Hmm, how do you turn round a tube at Hammersmith or West Ken without going into a tunnel? You kick the passengers out, run non-stop empty to Green Park and then open the doors and carry on. You can reverse at Hammersmith Picc only on the east to west via siding and West Kensington both ways. You can in fact reverse at Hammersmith west to east also, by departing e/b from the w/b platform and carrying passengers through the siding on to the e/b track. I've done it myself during a weekend closure west of Hammersmith. You cannot carry on empty in a single track tunnel with a defective radio unless a second person is also with the train operator or the OPO alarm still transmits. Were the OPO alarms working after Connect failed yesterday? The failure was caused by hardware fault at a connect core site.Radio calls were still being sent to the wrong talk groups (controller) this afternoon. So 2 complete lines stopped running because of one hardware fault in the radio system. I hope someone high up in LU is asking searching questions about resilience. Trains in the open sections did continue in passenger service (at the east end of the District) if Airwave radios are available. There are only a limited number on the network though. Does anyone know what the rules are on National Rail OPO trains if the cab radio fails? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) Well the whole Connect system is a mess! Nice idea, very poorly executed at the design stage. The "task force" put to then bring it in ASAP did a very good job at improving it and making improvements within the scope of the PFI contract - as well as some that required variation costs. Would handing the system over to Airwave make it more reliable I wonder? Do you mean LU trains operating over NR metals? The OPO alarm fitted to CTBC (deadmans) and train radio of "Tube" stock only need to function in the tunnel sections. LUL train radio rules still apply when on NR. If you mean what are the rules on NR trains operating without radios, then I don't know, except that any NR trains over LUL metals must have Cab Secure Radio or Connect Radio handsets. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "chunky munky" wrote in message ... Well the whole Connect system is a mess! Nice idea, very poorly executed at the design stage. Just like Airwave then - nice idea, shame about the role out... Would handing the system over to Airwave make it more reliable I wonder? Nooooooooooo!!!! It would never work, and if there where any other users it would be full! We have to suffer with airwave and while it might sometimes be upto the job for day to day work when things go wrong is usless and you might as well try your luck with the phones or analogue radio which often works much much better. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 6:54 pm, "Q" ..@.. wrote:
"chunky munky" wrote in message ... Well the whole Connect system is a mess! Nice idea, very poorly executed at the design stage. Just like Airwave then - nice idea, shame about the role out... Would handing the system over to Airwave make it more reliable I wonder? Nooooooooooo!!!! It would never work, and if there where any other users it would be full! We have to suffer with airwave and while it might sometimes be upto the job for day to day work when things go wrong is usless and you might as well try your luck with the phones or analogue radio which often works much much better. What I meant was to keep the existing Connect kit but hand the management over, Thales are currently the maintainer. I don't know if this is possible unless the PFI is cancelled just like Prestige (Oyster). All the TfL press releases have gone on about Connect saving time during incidents etc etc, but is definatly hasn't! The only benefit is 9 out of 10 times, you can at least hear the person on other end of the train radio! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathrow Connect - can't connect !! | London Transport | |||
Why can't LU cope with a signal failure? | London Transport | |||
Tube power failure at 18:15 on 17 May | London Transport | |||
Oyster Cards on buses - 50% failure rate? | London Transport | |||
Oystercard Failure | London Transport |