Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "asdf" wrote in message ... I dunno, surely it goes without saying that, all else being equal, there's less congestion with the charge than there would be without it? Dose it? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depresion wrote:
"asdf" wrote in message ... I dunno, surely it goes without saying that, all else being equal, there's less congestion with the charge than there would be without it? Dose it? What with? -- Moving things in still pictures! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Aug, 14:48, (Steve Firth) wrote:
John Rowland wrote: http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/634.htm I'm not sure who the Association of British Drivers are, so I'm not sure how much to read into this. It's hardly news. Anyone working in transport/telematics already knew that Livingstone had issued an edict that the lights across London were to be rephased to cause congestion prior to the introduction of the congestion charge. In fact I stated this was what was happening here at the time and had the usual cabal of ****wits and some who should have known better screaming that it was a lie. Road congestion is primarily caused by too many cars and if left to its own devices would be self-limiting. Indeed it could even result in a reduction of car travel as motorists get fed up with so many delays they are themselves responsible for. Unfortunately, our road spaces are allowed to be demand driven resulting in perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering to the detriment of the environment and quality of life of many people. -- World Carfree Network http://www.worldcarfree.net/ Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
On 16 Aug, 14:48, (Steve Firth) wrote: John Rowland wrote: http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/634.htm I'm not sure who the Association of British Drivers are, so I'm not sure how much to read into this. It's hardly news. Anyone working in transport/telematics already knew that Livingstone had issued an edict that the lights across London were to be rephased to cause congestion prior to the introduction of the congestion charge. In fact I stated this was what was happening here at the time and had the usual cabal of ****wits and some who should have known better screaming that it was a lie. Road congestion is primarily caused by too many cars and if left to its own devices would be self-limiting. Indeed it could even result in a reduction of car travel as motorists get fed up with so many delays they are themselves responsible for. Unfortunately, our road spaces are allowed to be demand driven resulting in perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering to the detriment of the environment and quality of life of many people. What new roads have been built in London (inside the M25) over the last (say) ten years Doug? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug wrote:
On 16 Aug, 14:48, (Steve Firth) wrote: John Rowland wrote: http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/634.htm I'm not sure who the Association of British Drivers are, so I'm not sure how much to read into this. It's hardly news. Anyone working in transport/telematics already knew that Livingstone had issued an edict that the lights across London were to be rephased to cause congestion prior to the introduction of the congestion charge. In fact I stated this was what was happening here at the time and had the usual cabal of ****wits and some who should have known better screaming that it was a lie. Road congestion is primarily caused by too many cars and if left to its own devices would be self-limiting. Indeed it could even result in a reduction of car travel as motorists get fed up with so many delays they are themselves responsible for. Unfortunately, our road spaces are allowed to be demand driven resulting in perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering to the detriment of the environment and quality of life of many people. -- World Carfree Network http://www.worldcarfree.net/ Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K. As i travel around South London a lot, you would have thought that I would have noticed the 'perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering', but apart from a few new residential roads being built at the same time as new housing I can think of none. There is very little if any road widening taking place. The majority of 'tinkering' is to stop up roads (leaving cycle access)lowering speed limits & creating one way streets. This is usually to stop rat runs & protect schools. Woolwich is on of the worst areas at the moment with road tinkering & that is to allow the extension of the DLR. I hope you will still be able to cycle with your damaged foot, the one you just shot yourself in. -- Tony the Dragon |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Tony Dragon
writes I hope you will still be able to cycle with your damaged foot, the one you just shot yourself in. That's Doug 'Colander Foot' Bollen you're talking to. -- Ed Banger |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone" wrote:
Doug wrote: On 16 Aug, 14:48, (Steve Firth) wrote: John Rowland wrote: http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/634.htm I'm not sure who the Association of British Drivers are, so I'm not sure how much to read into this. It's hardly news. Anyone working in transport/telematics already knew that Livingstone had issued an edict that the lights across London were to be rephased to cause congestion prior to the introduction of the congestion charge. In fact I stated this was what was happening here at the time and had the usual cabal of ****wits and some who should have known better screaming that it was a lie. Road congestion is primarily caused by too many cars and if left to its own devices would be self-limiting. Indeed it could even result in a reduction of car travel as motorists get fed up with so many delays they are themselves responsible for. Unfortunately, our road spaces are allowed to be demand driven resulting in perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering to the detriment of the environment and quality of life of many people. What new roads have been built in London (inside the M25) over the last (say) ten years Doug? Do wake up! Why cherry pick London where there isn't sufficient space available to build new roads but M25 widening still seems to be ongoing? Over the rest of UK there are loads of roads continually being built or widened. "Cost of Britain's road-building projects soars by almost £4bn By Michael Savage Saturday, 16 August 2008 Britain's road-building programme will cost the taxpayer billions of pounds more than expected, with some major projects more than doubling in price in five years, research indicates. Figures compiled by the Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) pressure group showed that 41 road projects which had been calculated to cost £4.45bn will now cost taxpayers £8.12bn – a rise of almost 83 per cent. Critics blame the Highways Agency, maintaining that at the time the projects were approved it made major errors in its calculation of inflation and the likely costs of materials, labour and compensation for homeowners. The study revealed that improvements to one stretch of the A14 between Ellington and Fen Ditton in Cambridgeshire had risen from an estimated £490m in 2003 to £1.2bn..." Mo http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...bn-898981.html -- World Carfree Network http://www.worldcarfree.net/ Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Doug writes On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone" wrote: Doug wrote: On 16 Aug, 14:48, (Steve Firth) wrote: John Rowland wrote: http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/634.htm I'm not sure who the Association of British Drivers are, so I'm not sure how much to read into this. It's hardly news. Anyone working in transport/telematics already knew that Livingstone had issued an edict that the lights across London were to be rephased to cause congestion prior to the introduction of the congestion charge. In fact I stated this was what was happening here at the time and had the usual cabal of ****wits and some who should have known better screaming that it was a lie. Road congestion is primarily caused by too many cars and if left to its own devices would be self-limiting. Indeed it could even result in a reduction of car travel as motorists get fed up with so many delays they are themselves responsible for. Unfortunately, our road spaces are allowed to be demand driven resulting in perpetual roadbuilding and widening and tinkering to the detriment of the environment and quality of life of many people. What new roads have been built in London (inside the M25) over the last (say) ten years Doug? Do wake up! Why cherry pick London where there isn't sufficient space available to build new roads but M25 widening still seems to be ongoing? Since you claim to live in London, Brimmy was just inviting you to write on what you know about (which, let's face it, isn't very much). Over the rest of UK there are loads of roads continually being built or widened. "Cost of Britain's road-building projects soars by almost £4bn That was an article about cost over-runs of existing road projects rather than a surge in new projects, Duhg. -- Ed Banger |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 5a4a808e-6952-481d-b554-3098a9ed7a79@
59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, Doug says... Why cherry pick London where there isn't sufficient space available to build new roads but M25 widening still seems to be ongoing? Where is this widening happening, Doug? I can't recall seeing any this year. Over the rest of UK there are loads of roads continually being built or widened. Actually, only a few stretches of the M1 are, Doug. -- Conor I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL admits to card-clash | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport |