London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 17th 08, 03:05 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 22
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows

John Wright wrote:
Doug wrote:
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone" wrote:
Doug wrote:


Do wake up!

Why cherry pick London


See the thread title? And the groups this is posted to? Are you some
kind of idiot?


A rhetorical question presumably?
(As that was. :-) )


  #2   Report Post  
Old August 17th 08, 03:16 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed TrafficFlows

Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Doug wrote:
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone" wrote:
Doug wrote:


Do wake up!

Why cherry pick London

See the thread title? And the groups this is posted to? Are you some
kind of idiot?


A rhetorical question presumably?
(As that was. :-) )


Indeed, a series of rhetorical questions in that I didn't expect any
response from Duhg on this.
--
John Wright

"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?

You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!" - Professor Temple Grandin
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 17th 08, 03:18 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 22
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows

John Wright wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Doug wrote:
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone"
wrote:
Doug wrote:


Do wake up!

Why cherry pick London
See the thread title? And the groups this is posted to? Are you some
kind of idiot?


A rhetorical question presumably?
(As that was. :-) )


Indeed, a series of rhetorical questions in that I didn't expect any
response from Duhg on this.


Doug is very well suited to being a politician in the present system. He
invariably answers the question he would have liked to have been asked
rather than the one actually posed.


  #4   Report Post  
Old August 17th 08, 03:24 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed TrafficFlows

Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Doug wrote:
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone"
wrote:
Doug wrote:
Do wake up!

Why cherry pick London
See the thread title? And the groups this is posted to? Are you some
kind of idiot?
A rhetorical question presumably?
(As that was. :-) )

Indeed, a series of rhetorical questions in that I didn't expect any
response from Duhg on this.


Doug is very well suited to being a politician in the present system. He
invariably answers the question he would have liked to have been asked
rather than the one actually posed.


Perhaps, but we do know he does not like the current system - not
authoritarian enough for him. (Does he understand words of 13 characters?)


--
John Wright

"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?

You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!" - Professor Temple Grandin
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 17th 08, 03:38 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 22
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows

John Wright wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
John Wright wrote:
Doug wrote:
On 17 Aug, 08:24, "Brimstone"
wrote:
Doug wrote:
Do wake up!

Why cherry pick London
See the thread title? And the groups this is posted to? Are you
some kind of idiot?
A rhetorical question presumably?
(As that was. :-) )
Indeed, a series of rhetorical questions in that I didn't expect any
response from Duhg on this.


Doug is very well suited to being a politician in the present
system. He invariably answers the question he would have liked to
have been asked rather than the one actually posed.


Perhaps, but we do know he does not like the current system - not
authoritarian enough for him.


Indeed, his authoritarian preferences can be seen when he's asked a question
he doesn't like and askes another.

(Does he understand words of 13
characters?)


It's not as short as "liar" so he might have difficulty with it.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TfL admits to card-clash Roland Perry London Transport 21 February 5th 14 07:29 PM
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway John B London Transport 92 October 25th 08 09:48 AM
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? Dr Ivan D. Reid London Transport 0 December 16th 07 08:47 AM
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? [email protected] London Transport 0 March 16th 05 01:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017