Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Wright wrote:
Richard J. wrote: JNugent wrote: Richard J. wrote: JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: Doug wrote: (Steve Firth) wrote: What new roads have been built in London (inside the M25) over the last (say) ten years Doug? I can name one: "University Way" (part of the A206), which is inside the M25, but which is not in London. The new-build part (which is now about ten years old anyway) is in Dartford, Kent. I am not aware of any other significant highway building inside the M25 (whether inside or outside London) in the last 20 years, let alone 10. There are plenty of examples of Livingstonian road sabotage, though. Witness the (former) A40 (M) Westway? Looks much the same as it always was, apart from the lack of lighting. No longer subject to proper motorway regulations (purely in order to bring it under Livingstone's control). I'm not entirely convinced that it was ever a proper motorway, as the relevant signs were blanked off many years before it became the A40, e.g. the old "end of motorway" sign at the Edgware Road flyover. However, I don't see that converting it from a motorway to an A road with restricted access (no pedestrians for example) makes any practical difference as to how useful it is. and the disgrace of the wrecking of the (very useful) short stretch of M41 at Shepherd's Bush. In what sense has it been wrecked? It was (part of) a motorway, six lanes and two hard shoulders. Look at it now. Since it's only half a mile long with a roundabout at each end, why would you need six lanes? Even at an emotional level, I can't work up any concern that it was the 6-lane M41 and is now the 4-lane A3220. It remains a useful link with a quirky layout, as it's always been. To claim that it's been wrecked is absurd. The actual length is pretty irrelevant, you need to look at the flow down the road. .... for which 4 lanes dual is very generous, especially since much of the traffic feeds into a two lane single carriageway south of Shepherds Bush. The length is relevant, because it is hard to get much over the 50mph limit on it, and the time saved by doing so is negligible, making hard shoulders a waste of space. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL admits to card-clash | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport |