Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JNugent wrote:
Brimstone wrote: JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: Strange, I'd always got the impression that you were in favour of more people being allowed to travel easily by road between various points in London? Maybe I've misunderstood. That does not include allowing pedestrians, cyclists, horses-and-carts, moped-riders and milk-floats to use motorways. Which motorway is such traffic allowed to use? The former A40(M), M41 and A102(M) - or at least, the automatic motorway restrictions no longer apply. All achieved by stripping those roads of their motorway status and handing them over to Mad Ken. So they're not motorways? I was wondering whether you would try that line. They used to be motorways and had the traffic-flow efficiencies of that category. Then they were reclassified as non-motorways precisely so that Mad Ken could get his grubby mitts on them and downgrade the speed limits, narrow them, or anything else of the sort of thing you'd expexct from him (he never had authority over any of the London motorways - eg, M1, M3(?), M4, M40, M11 - except the ones which were nobbled and handed over to him. I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? Have you seen the former M41 (with nearly half the road space snaffled for other purposes)? Have you not seen the reduction of the speed limit on the former A102(M) (now plain A102 south of the river and A12 north of it? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JNugent wrote:
Brimstone wrote: I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? Have you seen the former M41 (with nearly half the road space snaffled for other purposes)? I know of no road, either now nor previously, designated as the "M41". Have you not seen the reduction of the speed limit on the former A102(M) (now plain A102 south of the river and A12 north of it? I haven't been to that area for very many years. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? Have you seen the former M41 (with nearly half the road space snaffled for other purposes)? I know of no road, either now nor previously, designated as the "M41". It's the A3220 West Cross Route at Shepherd's Bush. It's been reduced from three to two lanes in each direction, so "nearly half" is an exaggeration. It doesn't seem to have affected capacity or journey times, which depend on the roundabouts at each end. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brimstone" wrote in message
... JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? Have you seen the former M41 (with nearly half the road space snaffled for other purposes)? I know of no road, either now nor previously, designated as the "M41". It's the short spur (probably only about a mile) from the A40 southwards to Shepherd's Bush roundabout. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer wrote:
Shepherd's Bush roundabout. Holland Park Roundabout! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in message
... Mortimer wrote: Shepherd's Bush roundabout. Holland Park Roundabout! Oh, is it called Holland Park roundabout? I always thought it was called SB roundabout, since it's only a hundred yards or so from SB shopping centre - the one which used to have a huge cutout of an HST on either side of the footbridge - and SB Common and SB LT and NR stations. But you're right: I've just checked on Multimap. I stand corrected! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Mortimer wrote: Shepherd's Bush roundabout. Holland Park Roundabout! Indeed, I'd always heard it referred to as Shepherd's Bush roundabout. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
John Rowland wrote: Mortimer wrote: Shepherd's Bush roundabout. Holland Park Roundabout! Indeed, I'd always heard it referred to as Shepherd's Bush roundabout. Ditto. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message ... JNugent wrote: Brimstone wrote: I used the Westway in both directions yesterday and noticed no diminuation in traffic capacity compared to their previous status. In fact the only change I saw was in the designation and numbering of the road and the consequent alteration in the direction sign colour. What is your evidence that there has been any such diminuation? Is there any point to your ranting other than to poitlessly and unjustifiably castigate Livingstone? Have you seen the former M41 (with nearly half the road space snaffled for other purposes)? I know of no road, either now nor previously, designated as the "M41". It's the short spur (probably only about a mile) from the A40 southwards to Shepherd's Bush roundabout. I thought it was the A41(M). Thanks for the correction. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL admits to card-clash | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport |