Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:32:13 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote: I would have built a new 2+2 road from Wood Lane to Holland Park roundabout through the development site, and linked the access roads to that. I would then have made the west side of the green two-way, opened the bus-only cut through on the east side of the green to all traffic, made the connection from the green to the roundabout bus/taxi/cycle only, probably one lane each way. This would make the green into a nice place to sunbathe or shop. Ah yes, a scheme to drag the Bush from its lowly status of poundshops, fast food shops and hangout for inebriated persons to a higher plane of niceness. Methinks it would be fought by Hamm council who never did much for this area, and fought by the green-clad monster next door which won't want retail competition outside its control. Lose shopping centre space to a 2+2 road to improve the green to the south and try to cure the eternal traffic jam? Madness! As for accommodating road traffic for the Westfield, isn't it going to be a Bluewater at peak times anyway? Despite the PT options, the sheer size can only pay for itself by sucking in traffic from the wealthy west of London. Crazy place for such a big centre really. The main dosh as far as I can see will be from the Beeb employees next door, and they're going to be purged further by banishment to Salford. White City estates probably won't be the W's main savour. Peeps on tubes usually don't carry 20 bags of goodies home. -- Old anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com appears broke So back to cmylod at bigfoot dot com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 10:03 am, Colum Mylod wrote:
As for accommodating road traffic for the Westfield, isn't it going to be a Bluewater at peak times anyway? Despite the PT options, the sheer size can only pay for itself by sucking in traffic from the wealthy west of London. Crazy place for such a big centre really. The main dosh as far as I can see will be from the Beeb employees next door, and they're going to be purged further by banishment to Salford. White City estates probably won't be the W's main savour. Peeps on tubes usually don't carry 20 bags of goodies home. I thought the idea was to be a less unbearable version of Oxford Street, from which peeps on Tubes frequently carry many, if not 20, bags of goodies home. You may well be right that that's a special case and that people won't be willing to do the same thing 10 minutes further west, though. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL admits to card-clash | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport |