Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 9:31*pm, "Richard J." wrote:
Mark Brader wrote: John Rowland: I notice that part of Gillett St N16 has been renamed to Bailey Place N16... unfortunately, there is already a Batley Place N16, so there will be numerous letters sent to the wrong address over the next 50 years. Not if the rest of the postcode is present and is used. Now let's talk about an Underground system that has two stations called Edgware Road and one called Edgware, but where trains to Ealing Broadway station are marked Ealing Abbreviated destination blinds on the District such as 'Ealing', 'Putney' and 'High Street' have not been seen since the retirement of R/CO/CP stock in about 1983. *Actually there's the exception of 'Olympia' which is still seen on D stock (both before and after refurbishment). *Also I did once see a train of original D stock on the High Street-Olympia shuttle with the ambiguous 'Kensington' on the blind. As I remember, 1962 stock on the Central had "EALING BDY" and R stock on the District had "EALING BDWY". |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Richard J. wrote:
Mark Brader wrote: Now let's talk about an Underground system that has two stations called Edgware Road and one called Edgware, but where trains to Ealing Broadway station are marked Ealing Abbreviated destination blinds on the District such as 'Ealing', 'Putney' and 'High Street' have not been seen since the retirement of R/CO/CP stock in about 1983. Actually there's the exception of 'Olympia' which is still seen on D stock (both before and after refurbishment). Also I did once see a train of original D stock on the High Street-Olympia shuttle with the ambiguous 'Kensington' on the blind. Oh i don't know, i think that's rather efficient. I mean, whichever way it's going, it's correct! tom -- 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:31:27 GMT, Richard J. wrote:
I notice that part of Gillett St N16 has been renamed to Bailey Place N16... unfortunately, there is already a Batley Place N16, so there will be numerous letters sent to the wrong address over the next 50 years. Not if the rest of the postcode is present and is used. Now let's talk about an Underground system that has two stations called Edgware Road and one called Edgware, but where trains to Ealing Broadway station are marked Ealing Abbreviated destination blinds on the District such as 'Ealing', 'Putney' and 'High Street' have not been seen since the retirement of R/CO/CP stock in about 1983. A Stock trains terminating at Harrow-on-the-Hill still display the slightly ambiguous "Harrow". |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:58:33 +0100, asdf
wrote: Abbreviated destination blinds on the District such as 'Ealing', 'Putney' and 'High Street' have not been seen since the retirement of R/CO/CP stock in about 1983. Anybody else remember the Q stock on the East London line which always showed Olympia - upside down? -- Bill Hayles http://billnot.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Bill Hayles) wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:58:33 +0100, asdf wrote: Abbreviated destination blinds on the District such as 'Ealing', 'Putney' and 'High Street' have not been seen since the retirement of R/CO/CP stock in about 1983. Anybody else remember the Q stock on the East London line which always showed Olympia - upside down? Not on my 1971 pictures of it. See www.rosenstiel.co.uk/trains, though the pictures could be clearer on destination plates. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Mark Brader wrote:
Now let's talk about an Underground system that has two stations called Edgware Road and one called Edgware, but where trains to Ealing Broadway station are marked Ealing, and Canada Water and Canary Wharf are consecutive stations on the same line... But which will get you from City Airport to Cyprus for a quid! tom -- 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Aug, 11:56, "John Rowland"
asked - who names new roads? All too often it is the marketing staff of building firms, leading to road names which are intened primarily to make the houses there sound more attractive to the least intelligent customers. Hence the decline of the 'street' as this sufix is considered un- trendy and the profusion of 'walks', 'crescents' and 'avenues', and the silly tendency to towrads road names with no suffix at all, making ordinary suburban streets sound as if they are rural hamlets too small to have street names as such. Jon |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 04:59:40 on Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Jon remarked: asked - who names new roads? All too often it is the marketing staff of building firms, leading to road names which are intened primarily to make the houses there sound more attractive to the least intelligent customers. I'm not sure that's the case. The builders often give developments such fancy names, which are then ignored by the council with much more prosaic names. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Roads, New Traffic Lights, New Post Code | London Transport | |||
Roads in the river | London Transport | |||
Private Roads | London Transport | |||
Britains Crap Roads, Answers wanted | London Transport | |||
Private roads | London Transport |