Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rupert Candy" wrote in message ... Incidentally, why did they have to make a 'pretend Underground train' out of a watered-down suburban train with only 2 doors per side? Surely the future S stock would have made a much better base vehicle for this sort of application? Probably because the Electrostar bodyshell already meets existing safety standards for the mainline railway, where as S stock is designed for metro-type operation, so would need to go through acceptance procedures for the NR system. Presumably Bombardier felt it was a lot easier (and less risky) to get acceptance on a variant of an existing, in service design. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOB Class 172s | London Transport | |||
Class 378 in service | London Transport | |||
New platform markings for class 378 at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport | |||
OT - BA postpones long-haul move to T5 | London Transport | |||
Waterloo - KX post Eurostar move | London Transport |