Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:56:18 -0700 (PDT), Rupert Candy
wrote: Incidentally, why did they have to make a 'pretend Underground train' out of a watered-down suburban train with only 2 doors per side? Surely the future S stock would have made a much better base vehicle for this sort of application? Dunno, but there is no excuse for 2-car DMUs to be being used on this kind of service. Nor should TfL be running 3 cars on the Watfords when 6 would fit with a bit of power upgrading. The whole of LO appears to me to be an almighty expensive cop-out for a capital city. Look at Merseyrail for how it should be done (and without any new MUs), then try again. Tube-style trains are a compromise for the Tube. There is no need for a heavy-rail S-Bahn to be like that. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOB Class 172s | London Transport | |||
Class 378 in service | London Transport | |||
New platform markings for class 378 at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport | |||
OT - BA postpones long-haul move to T5 | London Transport | |||
Waterloo - KX post Eurostar move | London Transport |