Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-11-07 11:37:19 +0000, disgoftunwells said:
On 20 Oct, 11:30, D7666 wrote: On Oct 20, 12:11 pm, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 04:06:19 on Mon, 20 Oct 2008, D7666 remarked: I won't believe it's finished until I can get a through train from Cambridge to Gatwick - one of the origi nal I am now of the opinion you won't. Even though they completed the tunnelling into SPILL I have alwys been sceptical about connecting up GN to it. They are going to all this trouble of re-arranging appoaches to Blackfriars and south/east thereof to avoid as far as possible conflicting moves to make 24 TPH in the core work, and then build a new junction across which every move will conflict right *in* the core ?!?!?!? Is it a flat junction? I thought the northbound line tunnelled under. -- Roland Perry Each switch forms a flat junction on both roads - even if there is no crossing by tunnelling. When running 24 TPH you don't really want any points at all. Don't forget these are long 12 car trains running into or out of the SPILL station stop - and all trains will stop - they ain't going to be high speed across the convergence point. Take the Jubilee line now (before resgignalling). That is planned 24 TPH in the peaks, with trains half that length, and it barely works. Now put in a new junction at say London Bridge, right off the end of platforms of one of the busiest core stations, even with a dive/fly to avoid a crossing, but nonetheless convergence points on both west and eastbound roads. *You reckon 24 TPH would still work ? It works with the Munich S-Bahn. However, they do have double sided platforms. At the risk of being pedantic the S-Bahn in Munich schedules 30 trains per hour during the peaks (admittedly not at the moment as there have been problems with the brakes/wheel slide protection during the autumn and the automatic door closing equipment, but these should be cleared up by the beginning of next year). Only the 3 busiest stations of the 5 in the tunnel section have the double sided arrangement (the Hauptbahnhof, Karlsplatz/Stachus and Marienplatz), but the Ostbahhof has 4 platforms dedicated to the S-Bahn service so the trains can be launched into the tunnel section. Note that two lines, currently the S5 and S6, /reverse/ at the Ostbahnhof. At Donnersbergerbrücke, west of the Hbf, routes from the south and from the west come together on each side of an island platform; they join just east of the station for the run towards the city centre via the Hbf. The signalling is such that about 75 seconds after a train has left one platform the one on the opposite face can also leave. These trains are quick - the Baureihe 423 is an articulated unit with 4 body sections carried on 5 bogies, 4 of which are powered. It has an empty mass of 105 tonnes with an hourly rating of 2400kW which gives a power-to-weight ratio somewhat better than that of a Deltic running light! They also have /lots/ of doors - each body section has 3 pairs of swing-plug doors so half the side of the train opens. Trying to run a 24tph service with only 2 doors per side in a longer coach body, single sided platforms and a lower power-to-weight ratio seems to me to be hard way to earn a living. One of the problems with the Jubilee is some stations are quite quick (Waterloo East) and others are slow because of passenger volumes (Canary Wharf, LB, Waterloo). How will the spread be on Thameslink? -- Nick -- Nick -- Robert |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exciting news on Thameslink 2000 (now "Thameslink Project") | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 2000 and other animals | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 2000 | London Transport | |||
THAMESLINK 2000 | London Transport | |||
New Thameslink 2000 proposals? | London Transport |