Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Oct, 00:08, John B wrote:
I'm deeply sceptical, although it's possible that the people you spoke to were idiots. In real life, bendies provide a much better service than other buses on a given route. He did say they "weren't very popular". What he didn't say was whether those same people thought replacing them with normal double deckers would fix anything. U |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 22, 12:38*am, Mr Thant
wrote: I'm deeply sceptical, although it's possible that the people you spoke to were idiots. In real life, bendies provide a much better service than other buses on a given route. He did say they "weren't very popular". What he didn't say was whether those same people thought replacing them with normal double deckers would fix anything. Fair point, although 'popular' only has any relevance at all when compared to plausible alternatives (so if bendies weren't very popular compared to, say, gold-plated Rolls-Royces, or double deckers that weren't rammed so full you'd need to wait for three to pass before you could get on one, then that's entirely irrelevant). I lived in Finsbury Park when the 29 got bendified. It went from being a route where you'd have two or more double deckers go past you in the morning too full to stop, to a bus which - although always well- loaded, and relatively rarely endowed with many seats - you could still always get on. Compared to that fact, none of the other criteria matter in the slightest. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Oct, 00:47, John B wrote:
Fair point, although 'popular' only has any relevance at all when compared to plausible alternatives Well the comparison point is the non-bendy routes that people use, which generally are more pleasant. The mistake is to think that the bendy routes would suddenly be more pleasant if only they were converted to double decker, which as you say, is not the case. U |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B wrote:
Fair point, although 'popular' only has any relevance at all when compared to plausible alternatives (so if bendies weren't very popular compared to, say, gold-plated Rolls-Royces, or double deckers that weren't rammed so full you'd need to wait for three to pass before you could get on one, then that's entirely irrelevant). I've often been left standing at bus stops day and night because the bendies are so packed they don't stop. Maybe the 29 is different but the 25 has been a much worse travelling experience since becoming a bendy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube Plan To Axe 1,500 Jobs And Close All But 30 Ticket Offices | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows | London Transport | |||
Signs and portents (well, a map, anyway) | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport |