Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:25 pm, Tom Anderson wrote: They could put the engine on top of the cab. That would make the transmission a bit complicated, though. Would probably look quite good though ![]() could have the engine offset to one side and have a one person only cab on the other side at the same level. Though I suspect HGV drivers actually like their high up view lording it over the rest of us ![]() Yes. And for that reason such a design wouldn't sell, unless made compulsory. I'd have the driver in front of the engine and under the load - containers ride higher than the roof of many cars. This would improve forward and side visibility, and stop the driver feeling superior. Also he would know that in a severe collision he'd get the engine in his back followed by the load on his head! Colin McKenzie -- No-one has ever proved that cycle helmets make cycling any safer at the population level, and anyway cycling is about as safe per mile as walking. Make an informed choice - visit www.cyclehelmets.org. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube Plan To Axe 1,500 Jobs And Close All But 30 Ticket Offices | London Transport | |||
Boris admits bendy-buses are safe - but he'll axe them anyway | London Transport | |||
TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows | London Transport | |||
Signs and portents (well, a map, anyway) | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport |