Stuart wrote:
Stevie wrote:
It seems a bit strange that after they spend the billions of pounds on
the nice shiny new route and enlarging St Pancras they then carry on
using Waterloo.

Mind you, it would seem strange after the millions of pounds building a
lovely international terminal at Waterloo not to use it

Yeah and think of the fun we've all had at having French visitors to the UK
arriving in London at a station called Waterloo! St.Pancras just doesn't
have the same er....ring to it, does it? :-)

"Stephen O'Connell" wrote the
following in:

Stuart wrote:
Stevie wrote:
It seems a bit strange that after they spend the billions of
pounds on
the nice shiny new route and enlarging St Pancras they then
carry on using Waterloo.

Mind you, it would seem strange after the millions of pounds
building a lovely international terminal at Waterloo not to use
it

Yeah and think of the fun we've all had at having French visitors
to the UK arriving in London at a station called Waterloo!
St.Pancras just doesn't have the same er....ring to it, does it?
:-)

It's always reminded me of the organ which is defective in diabetics.

--
message by Robin May, consumer of liquids
If bathroom means toilet in America, I'll have a shower please.

Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort.

St George for England, St Pancras for Sco...er...France!

"Stephen O'Connell" wrote in message
...
Stuart wrote:
Stevie wrote:
It seems a bit strange that after they spend the billions of pounds on
the nice shiny new route and enlarging St Pancras they then carry on
using Waterloo.

Mind you, it would seem strange after the millions of pounds building a
lovely international terminal at Waterloo not to use it

Yeah and think of the fun we've all had at having French visitors to the
UK
arriving in London at a station called Waterloo! St.Pancras just doesn't
have the same er....ring to it, does it? :-)