Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Paul Corfield wrote:
http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/publi.../way-to-go.pdf I'll resist the temptation to comment further and leave it to those who are interested to respond. The public realm stuff - getting rid of fences, poles, and other things which get in the way of pedestrians - sounds good. The anti-bendy bigotry less so. What's this about a tunnel under Park Lane? tom -- Thinking about it, history begins now -- sarah |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Excellent idea to remove roadside barriers and unnecessary street furniture. I look forward to crossing Mansion House junction at street level without the risk of being pinned against a metal barrier by an HGV/PCV. Likewise the roads in the vicinity of Victoria station, which are a disgrace for pedestrians heading in the Westminster direction. I would advocate this idea is taken further, with road markings removed from non-trunk roads, where possible. Disappointed to see the document (or a summary thereof) will still be translated into a multitude of different languages - or 'your language' as it says. If you're resident in the United Kingdon, 'your language' is English. Chris |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:58:23 -0000, "Chris Read"
wrote: Excellent idea to remove roadside barriers and unnecessary street furniture. I look forward to crossing Mansion House junction at street level without the risk of being pinned against a metal barrier by an HGV/PCV. Likewise the roads in the vicinity of Victoria station, which are a disgrace for pedestrians heading in the Westminster direction. I would advocate this idea is taken further, with road markings removed from non-trunk roads, where possible. Disappointed to see the document (or a summary thereof) will still be translated into a multitude of different languages - or 'your language' as it says. If you're resident in the United Kingdon, 'your language' is English. Tha e ? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Read wrote:
If you're resident in the United Kingdon, 'your language' is English. Nac adrodd a glywaist rhag ei fod yn gelwyddog! -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p12198540.html (57 010 at Sytch Lane (Slindon), 31 Jan 2005) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Nov, 15:32, wrote:
On 6 Nov, 15:04, Neil *Williams wrote: It is a fact that a 4x4 causes no more of a traffic jam than a normally-sized car. *A Land Rover Defender SWB, for instance, is as I recall shorter and narrower then a Vauxhall Corsa. Unfortunately a Land Rover Defender SWB is not representative of the 4x4 vehicles you see on the streets of London. Most 4x4 vehicles, people carriers and other similar vehicles are that bit wider, longer and higher and make a significant difference to other road users - when parking, turning out of junctions, trying to move around in queues, passing on narrow roads with parked cars. The other frequent problem with these* is tinted windows that are too dark to see through properly, so you can't make eye contact and you can't see through to the other end/side. And for cyclists, you can't easily see over these cars to anticipate what's coming ahead. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
disgoftunwells gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying: And for cyclists, you can't easily see over these cars to anticipate what's coming ahead. Perhaps you shouldn't be sat so close behind them? I mean, it's not as if vans/trucks/buses are any easier to see through/round/over than an SUV, is it? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... Launched today by the Mayor of London is this initial consultation document on the likely direction and principles to be used in the updated Mayoral Transport Strategy. http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/publi.../way-to-go.pdf Press release here http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_...eleaseid=19568 I'll resist the temptation to comment further and leave it to those who are interested to respond. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No one seems to mention the horse any more surely we should be encouraging the building of stables everywhere so that commuters could rent nags by the hour or daily,the manure which is dropped could be used to fertilise organic allotments & think of all the fun you could have dashing about town,I can,t wait to buy a tricorn hat and breeches Tallyho!! |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, RobWilton wrote:
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... Launched today by the Mayor of London is this initial consultation document on the likely direction and principles to be used in the updated Mayoral Transport Strategy. http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/publi.../way-to-go.pdf Press release here http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_...eleaseid=19568 I'll resist the temptation to comment further and leave it to those who are interested to respond. No one seems to mention the horse any more surely we should be encouraging the building of stables everywhere so that commuters could rent nags by the hour or daily,the manure which is dropped could be used to fertilise organic allotments & think of all the fun you could have dashing about town,I can,t wait to buy a tricorn hat and breeches Tallyho!! You want to come and have a wander or a cycle round Ashburton Grove after an Arsenal home match to see the flaw with that - just a handful of police horses leave half the neighbourhood paved in ****. No, horses are not the future. Space hoppers, on the other hand ... tom -- VENN DIAGRAM THAT LOOK LIKE TWO BIG CIRCLES EQUAL BAD PUBLIC POLICY. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov, 11:29, Adrian wrote:
Perhaps you shouldn't be sat so close behind them? I mean, it's not as if vans/trucks/buses are any easier to see through/round/over than an SUV, is it? Which is rather my point. If it is the mere size of 4x4s that is the issue for congestion, not the pollution they may emit (that a small, low sports car may also do), then this should apply to all vehicles of that size, even electric vans. The real objection I have to Ken's latest iteration of the Congestion Charge is that it became a personal vendetta against the 4x4. Not against large vehicles, not against polluting vehicles, but specifically against the 4x4. Personal vendettas in politics are never good, which is probably why I don't like the idea of mayors anyway (and why I prefer parliamentary rather than presidential democracy). No, incidentally, I do not own a 4x4, and even if I did I wouldn't be wanting to drive it in London. Boris is as bad for his personal vendetta against the bendy bus. There are routes in London where they aren't appropriate, of course, but there are routes (the 73, the Red Arrows) where they are *very* appropriate and do the job vastly better than any Routemaster ever did. Neil |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'The Way Out Tube Map' | London Transport | |||
March your way into the weekend! | London Transport | |||
Whats the quickest way.... | London Transport | |||
Are bonds the way forward? | London Transport | |||
A13 - East India Dock Link to Aspen Way (A1261) | London Transport |