Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 3:42*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
"Rupert Candy" wrote special Victoria-Nunhead-Hither Grn-Bromley North service, Why is double track retained on the Bromley North branch? It's years since timetables have required more than one train to be on the branch at a time. Indeed. (My train today used the 'normal' platform at Brpmley North, despite the special service). It did make me realize how many useful gaps a Bromley-Lewisham-Victoria service would fill (you only have to look at the 208 bus to see the suppressed demand). uk.transport.london added. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rupert Candy" wrote in message
... On Nov 16, 3:42 pm, "Peter Masson" wrote: "Rupert Candy" wrote special Victoria-Nunhead-Hither Grn-Bromley North service, Why is double track retained on the Bromley North branch? It's years since timetables have required more than one train to be on the branch at a time. Indeed. (My train today used the 'normal' platform at Brpmley North, despite the special service). It did make me realize how many useful gaps a Bromley-Lewisham-Victoria service would fill (you only have to look at the 208 bus to see the suppressed demand). uk.transport.london added. In 1967, apart from the through peak trains, about 6 each way to Charing Cross (although it has always been a "City" branch), the Orpington/Sevenoaks-CX trains went fast from Grove Park to Lon. Bridge, with the Bromleys filling in the intermediate stations. Now, with the DLR and soon(ish) the ELL, a similar pattern should be re-introduced. Peakwise, the advantage of the Bromley North trains was that passengers from Grove Park stood a fair chance of a seat even when the BY and SPk between them had 3000 season ticket holders alone. These days, not much hope. I guess they keep the double track, although nearly all the pointwork at Grove Park has been removed, to save the cost of singling and single line operation. Also, it is used for diversions, driver training etc and gives some flexibility in these situations. The use of Platform 2 at BY has always seemed odd but seems to go back to the days when freight still came to the branch and the engines would run round on platform 1. P1 is used from time to time to stop it rusting up. MaxB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Batman55" wrote In 1967, apart from the through peak trains, about 6 each way to Charing Cross (although it has always been a "City" branch), the Orpington/Sevenoaks-CX trains went fast from Grove Park to Lon. Bridge, with the Bromleys filling in the intermediate stations. Now, with the DLR and soon(ish) the ELL, a similar pattern should be re-introduced. Peakwise, the advantage of the Bromley North trains was that passengers from Grove Park stood a fair chance of a seat even when the BY and SPk between them had 3000 season ticket holders alone. These days, not much hope. A regular service from Bromley North to Victoria, or even Cannon Street, does not make much sense, in view of the need to cross from the Fast to Slow lines, but a peak Bromley North to Charing Cross service would reduce the distance a train has to run partly loaded, and still leave room for Grove Park and Hither Green passengers. As there is a shortage of paths at Lewisham, a Sidcup Line to Victoria service would make sense, as this would not conflict with Bexleyheath Line to Cannon Street trains. Peter |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 6:32*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
"Batman55" wrote In 1967, apart from the through peak trains, about 6 each way to Charing Cross (although it has always been a "City" branch), the Orpington/Sevenoaks-CX trains went fast from Grove Park to Lon. Bridge, with the Bromleys filling in the intermediate stations. Now, with the DLR and soon(ish) the ELL, a similar pattern should be re-introduced. Peakwise, the advantage of the Bromley North trains was that passengers from Grove Park stood a fair chance of a seat even when the BY and SPk between them had 3000 season ticket holders alone. These days, not much hope. A regular service from Bromley North to Victoria, or even Cannon Street, does not make much sense, in view of the need to cross from the Fast to Slow lines, but a peak Bromley North to Charing Cross service would reduce the distance a train has to run partly loaded, and still leave room for Grove Park and Hither Green passengers. As there is a shortage of paths at Lewisham, a Sidcup Line to Victoria service would make sense, as this would not conflict with Bexleyheath Line to Cannon Street trains. Peter There still seems to be a regular gap in the pattern through Lewisham left by the Sidcup line to Blackfriars services that were all withdrawn by handwritten board halfway through a timetable. I never understood why that was done, or done that way. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rare Overground Track? | London Transport | |||
Track Charts or Track maps of the London Underground | London Transport | |||
Metro-Land | London Transport | |||
LCR's Stratford City land wanted for Olympics | London Transport | |||
Willesden Junction rare-ish track open today | London Transport |