Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:59:06 -0000, "Andrew Heenan"
wrote: Of course there's a chance of the Gemini - door speed and reliability somewhere in between. The Gemini is a very good bus. It wouldn't upset me at all if TfL were to specify it as the only double decker to be used in London. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Barry wrote:
One of the things I like about bendies is that I can touch in at my leisure once I'm on the bus, which is good if you run to catch one, as you don't then stand panting in the front doorway trying to remember which pocket the Oyster is in while people grumble behind you. I don't doubt there are some advantages. But there are many drawbacks and what the balance is is pivotal here. Along with the astonishingly fast loading* and boarding passengers not getting mixed up with people coming down the stairs to disembark, of course. Try the scrum when a packed bendy reaches a busy stop and people are clambering over each other to get on or off... Even a relatively empty double decker suffers from that, so heaven knows what the 38 will be like on the first week after debendification. It's high time a realistic look was taken at this subject, particularly if you ever believed anything Andrew Gilligan wrote on the subject. I have never read much by Gilligan on this issue. I base my own opinions on experience of the 25 before and after bendification, and on the local reaction, especially on the section where a double-decker is also available. Try a bendy bus on a diversion into a residential side-street and you'll see the chaos up close. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:59:06PM -0000, Andrew Heenan wrote:
Luckily for the Good Folk of North East London, Routemaster2 won't be ready to be forced upon them. In fact, it won't be ready until after the next Mayoral election ... so we might all be spared the indignity of the BorisBlunderBus. Betcha the contracts are signed within the next 3.5 years. -- David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information comparative and superlative explained: Huhn worse, worser, worsest, worsted, wasted |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(David Cantrell) wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 06:41:47PM -0600, wrote: In article , (Andrew Heenan) wrote: Has Boris canned this, either because of cost, or because it was 'bendy related'? Apparently not, if the signs are to be believed. I've not seen any signs of work near the Shaftesbury Avenue/New Oxford St junction. I've only just noticed the signs, so I assume they've only gone up in the past few days. They're warning of work that will be starting shortly. They were there signs at the junction I mentioned last week. And they say work starts in November so, if they haven't started, they'd better get a move on! -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Contactless and revenue checks | London Transport | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport | |||
Bag-checks on the L.U? | London Transport | |||
Ticket Checks at Vauxhall LU | London Transport | |||
Thameslink ticket checks - or lack of! | London Transport |