Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 26, 5:52*am, John B wrote:
On Nov 26, 12:49*pm, Robert wrote: In view of the number of trains planned to pass westwards through the central tunnel which will terminate at Paddington Hmm. That's 14tph reversing in the 'official' plans - however, it'll actually be at most 8tph. There is no way the 4tph HEx won't go over to Crossrail, because there'll be absolutely nobody willing to pay double the Crossrail fare for a slightly faster journey to suburban nowhere where they have to change, compared to a direct journey to the West End, City and Canary Wharf. Correct. Standalone Heathrow Express will become a nonesense post Crossrail. There is also no way that the 2tph Oxford stoppers won't go over to Crossrail, since they're the only other trains using the GWML slow lines, and by the time Crossrail opens electrification will almost certainly exist to Oxford (and absolutely certainly to Reading, where the slow Oxfords might temporarily become shuttles if the GWML programme is massively behind expectations). Electrification to Oxford sounds like a stretch to me. Reading is a realistic target. It's just a case of agreeing with BAA how fares and revenues will work in the first case, and of ensuring that Reading/Oxford electrification doesn't go on the Crossrail costs in the second. In this economic climate do we believe the politicians/treasury will agree to funding Electrification to Oxford. I wish, but I doubt it. The remaining 8tph might seem like a bit of a pity at first. On the other hand, it'll be good to open a new link with that kind of flexibility, allowing further extensions to whichever line appears most to need the capacity in 8-10 years' time (at the moment, the W/NW London commuter lines don't have the same desperate need for capacity as those in E and SE London. This may change). Taking over the H&C west of Paddington wouldn't surprise me all that much, at least if S- stock, ATO and the T-cup fail to solve SSL reliability/capacity issues. Crossrail should take over the Hammersmith branch. But there is the question of a maintenance depot for the Circle Line. If the depot at Hammersmith was sold off for redevelopment perhaps the funds could be utilized for "beefing up" Neasden. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport |