Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 27, 6:24*am, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Boltar wrote: On Nov 26, 4:51 pm, 1506 wrote: Crossrail should take over the Hammersmith branch. *But there is the What would be the point of that? To eliminate the flat junction at Praed Street. It wouldn't make the service any quicker But it would improve throughput and reliability, on both the Hammersmith branch and the Circle. and would reduce the number of trains on the northern part of the circle line. No, you'd extend the Wimblewares and run more Mets beyond Baker Street to make up the difference. question of a maintenance depot for the Circle Line. *If the depot at And probably a question of loading gauge too I suspect. I *think*, but am not sure, that the H&C trains are wider and taller than Crossrails will be. However, i think Crossrail carriages will be longer, which increases their effective size on curves, so you could be right. And of course they'll be much longer, which would mean platform alterations, and the moving of the crossover at Hammersmith. All true, but in the bigger picture, these are minor engineering type problems. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport |