Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, 1506 wrote:
On Nov 27, 6:24*am, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Boltar wrote: And probably a question of loading gauge too I suspect. I *think*, but am not sure, that the H&C trains are wider and taller than Crossrails will be. However, i think Crossrail carriages will be longer, which increases their effective size on curves, so you could be right. And of course they'll be much longer, which would mean platform alterations, and the moving of the crossover at Hammersmith. All true, but in the bigger picture, these are minor engineering type problems. In the bigger picture, isn't pretty much everything we discuss on this group? What it comes down to is how much cold, hard cash has to be stumped up for it, and how much value it delivers in return. I'm not saying that Crossrailing the H&C branch wouldn't be good value for money, but i don't think you can just wave away the costs as minor engineering type problems. tom -- All roads lead unto death row; who knows what's after? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
Crossrail NOT making connections | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport |