Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Dec 12, 11:03 pm, "Batman55" wrote: "Matthew Dickinson" wrote in message ... The gateline at Waterloo mainline seems to be finished apart from a few ceiling tiles and and some fencing. The gates have now been switched on,but are not in use yet. The ticket machines have been fitted with a black rectangular pad which I think is a smartcard reader. The peak hour subway has now been closed until 'further notice' for installation of the gateline there. I had to use the gate on Platform 19 on Thursday! MaxB I had to use Platform 18/19 gates last week - believe they were activated early that week. The Platform 20 signage is also now in place - any ideas when the platform will be in use? When do they plan to install gates for the Waterloo & City? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:39:58 -0000, wrote:
[waterloo] When do they plan to install gates for the Waterloo & City? You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. I'd also say with confidence that it is impossible to gate Waterloo W&C safely anyway. -- Paul C |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Dec, 12:20, Paul Corfield wrote:
You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. * There's ungated access to all other lines, or is that not a worry? U |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message
... On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:39:58 -0000, wrote: [waterloo] When do they plan to install gates for the Waterloo & City? You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. So? You can get transfer onto another line or the DLR via the passageway. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 13 Dec, 13:52, wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote: On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:39:58 -0000, wrote: [waterloo] When do they plan to install gates for the Waterloo & City? You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. So? You can get transfer onto another line or the DLR via the passageway. The point Mr Thant is making is that in a sense Waterloo W&C line offers ungated access to the LU network. As a response I'd say that it's pretty much impossible to enclose the LU network in a hermetically sealed bubble. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote ...
You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. So? You can get transfer onto another line or the DLR via the passageway. The point Mr Thant is making is that in a sense Waterloo W&C line offers ungated access to the LU network. As a response I'd say that it's pretty much impossible to enclose the LU network in a hermetically sealed bubble. You can enter via the Finsbury Park - Moorgate link, too, and I'm sure there are others. But so long as one end or the other is gated, 99.9% of journeys will be monitored at some point. Plus it's only a question of time before DLR is under pressure to improve security, especially once the six-car trains get moving. -- Andrew |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 13 Dec, 14:46, "Andrew Heenan" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote ... You don't need them at Waterloo as Bank is gated and there are no intermediate stops. So? You can get transfer onto another line or the DLR via the passageway. The point Mr Thant is making is that in a sense Waterloo W&C line offers ungated access to the LU network. As a response I'd say that it's pretty much impossible to enclose the LU network in a hermetically sealed bubble. You can enter via the Finsbury Park - Moorgate link, too, and I'm sure there are others. But so long as one end or the other is gated, 99.9% of journeys will be monitored at some point. There are many others but I'm not going to start making a list of them! Agree in essence about the point re one or other end of the journey being gated, but of course there are numerous journeys where neither end is gated - again I've no intention of making a list of them! As Paul C says downthread, the system is permeable and this will always be the case - gates help but they are not a solution to fare evasion in and of themselves. Plus it's only a question of time before DLR is under pressure to improve security, especially once the six-car trains get moving. By security I take it you mean fare checking (or 'revenue inspection' - but I dislike that phrase because I think it's very narrow) - not quite the same thing in my mind but of course they overlap. Interesting thought - I hadn't considered the difference six car trains (or three car - depending on how you look at it!) might make to checking tickets. Most DLR stations simply ain't set up to accomodate tickets gates, so I dare say that if there is deemed to be an issue then teams of roving inspectors would fit the bill - I don't think I've ever come across such a thing on a DLR train actually, though I have seen ticket checking teams at stations a few times. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
By security I take it you mean fare checking (or 'revenue inspection' - but I dislike that phrase because I think it's very narrow) - not quite the same thing in my mind but of course they overlap. Interesting thought - I hadn't considered the difference six car trains (or three car - depending on how you look at it!) might make to checking tickets. Most DLR stations simply ain't set up to accomodate tickets gates, so I dare say that if there is deemed to be an issue then teams of roving inspectors would fit the bill - I don't think I've ever come across such a thing on a DLR train actually, though I have seen ticket checking teams at stations a few times. I have a few times on the Stratford branch. Perhaps that's also because Stratford is a nightmare for knowing how to use Oyster correctly when interchanging (especially from tickets). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote ...
Plus it's only a question of time before DLR is under pressure to improve security, especially once the six-car trains get moving. By security I take it you mean fare checking (or 'revenue inspection' - but I dislike that phrase because I think it's very narrow) - not quite the same thing in my mind but of course they overlap. Interesting thought - I hadn't considered the difference six car trains (or three car - depending on how you look at it!) might make to checking tickets. Most DLR stations simply ain't set up to accomodate tickets gates, so I dare say that if there is deemed to be an issue then teams of roving inspectors would fit the bill - I don't think I've ever come across such a thing on a DLR train actually, though I have seen ticket checking teams at stations a few times. In the early days (2 car trains), I rarely travelled without the 'nondriver' inspecting my ticket; this pretty much died out when they went 4-car. -- Andrew |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:02:00 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote: The point Mr Thant is making is that in a sense Waterloo W&C line offers ungated access to the LU network So, last time I checked, did Kensington Olympia. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG gateline experiment | London Transport | |||
UTS Gateline codes | London Transport | |||
Stratford Jubilee gateline defunct | London Transport | |||
Wandsworth Town station gateline | London Transport | |||
City Thameslink gateline | London Transport |