Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Jan, 11:52, "Recliner" wrote:
"thedarkman" wrote in message So go on, please give us a quick summary of what money is saved. *Yes, you won't need the Oyster card system, barriers and ticket machines, but are you suggesting they cost more than the fares raised? And would you give free travel to all the tourists and other foreign visitors to the UK? Have you read my letter and the associated mathematics? No ticket staff, no revenue protection and therefore no prosecutions for fraudulent travel, which costs millions in court time and stuff. If all the money comes from one source - Central Government - you cut out the costs associated with the other two. All of them. Free travel will lead to greater use of public transport, less petrol imported, less expense, less air pollution. As for the bloke who said if you use it, you pay for it, he misses the point that the taxpayer is already subsidising travel, ie the privately owne train companies. Wouldn't you rather see the public subsidised directly? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Full 2011 fares now on the TfL website (inc. NR PAYG fares) | London Transport | |||
Is the teacup necessary? | London Transport | |||
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
"Due to necessary engineering work...." | London Transport | |||
Qualifications necessary to become a station rank taxi driver | London Transport |