Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 2:40*am, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll-
wrote: Mizter T wrote: I'm evidently just not that imaginative to have thought about it already. A potential through service from Aylesbury is surely *the* selling point of this link, is it not? I could never get myself that excited about it beforehand, as I didn't think the benefits of there being 'more Met line' at Watford really made the whole thing seem that worthwhile, but as part of a wider service the proposed Croxley link starts to look rather more attractive. I was under the impression the plan was to make two obscure back-water suburban stub branches into a through root and make the town of Watford more accessible from the Met. The Aylesbury link hasn't been mentioned that often. Much more was made of the Watford - Aylesbury service when the link was being talked up in the 80s and 90s. There were also some grandious proposals for an Aylesbury to St. Albans service involving a flyover (or dive under) at Watford Junction. Back then, the plan was supposed to be self-financing as the sale of the Watford Met branch for housing would pay for the new alignment. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boost for Tube extension plan as Wandsworth gets triple-A ratings | London Transport | |||
Watford Junction plans get cash boost | London Transport | |||
Boost your business with Quality Web & Design Services at BargainPrices! | London Transport | |||
Tony Blair support for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Stop cross posting into alt.support.impotence | London Transport |