"Mizter T" wrote ...
What case pending?
So far as I've read, there is no prosecution happening or planned.
(my first post on this matter).
Why reply to my post when what you quote is what the starter of this
thread (John Rowland) said?

If I'd seen that, obviously I wouldn't have.
But I didn't.
Sorry if it ruined your day.

In article
,
(contrex) wrote:

On 7 Feb, 10:52, wrote:
In article ,

(Adrian) wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory
without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has
revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case ...

Has he? Where? He is certainly refusing to talk about it, but I
haven't seen him give any legal reason why he could not do so.

He doesn't want to talk about - wisely, imho - in the run-up to his
standards board hearing. It's not a court case, true.

It's a hearing by a panel of the City Council's Standards Committee.
When the Standards Board considered these sorts of things you
wouldn't have read about it until after the hearing.

Well, Colin, of course I shouldn't comment upon the case, but I hope
it's all right to say that I'm sorry to hear about your spot of
trouble, and I hope it all goes all right for you. You seem like a
decent fellow, and I wish you well.

Thank you.

--
Colin Rosenstiel