Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A tale of confusing tickets and receipts...
The other day I had to get an extension to my Z1-4 season ticket, on the student discount, in order to go to Epsom. At Waterloo I presented my Oyster, the paper receipt and my Young Person's Railcard as usual (although the SWT staff haven't always ben consistent about whether I can get a YPR discount for this or not). The SWT staffer was the first one to use an Oyster reader for my card in such circumstances, rather than just looking at the receipt. He said that my receipt had been printed on a Gold Card slip and should have been printed on another, and that technically when in the past I've been given extensions marked as for Gold Card I've been effectively travelling illegally as I don't have such a one. Looking at some of the past paper tickets it seems that one of the reasons I haven't always got the YPR discount has been because of the Gold Card. Does anyone know: a) If/how I can get a new paper receipt for my season ticket for future use? b) Whether it's possible to complain about the TfL staffer at Colindale who created the mess in the first place? c) If anyone TOC has ever considered selling extensions from ticket machines, thus allowing the customer to buy what they know they need/have the discount for? (And with Oyster surely it would be easy to validate existing tickets.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 8:41*pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll-
wrote: A tale of confusing tickets and receipts... The other day I had to get an extension to my Z1-4 season ticket, on the student discount, in order to go to Epsom. At Waterloo I presented my Oyster, the paper receipt and my Young Person's Railcard as usual (although the SWT staff haven't always ben consistent about whether I can get a YPR discount for this or not). The SWT staffer was the first one to use an Oyster reader for my card in such circumstances, rather than just looking at the receipt. He said that my receipt had been printed on a Gold Card slip and should have been printed on another, and that technically when in the past I've been given extensions marked as for Gold Card I've been effectively travelling illegally as I don't have such a one. Looking at some of the past paper tickets it seems that one of the reasons I haven't always got the YPR discount has been because of the Gold Card. Does anyone know: a) If/how I can get a new paper receipt for my season ticket for future use? b) Whether it's possible to complain about the TfL staffer at Colindale who created the mess in the first place? c) If anyone TOC has ever considered selling extensions from ticket machines, thus allowing the customer to buy what they know they need/have the discount for? (And with Oyster surely it would be easy to validate existing tickets.) Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 10:02*pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll-
wrote: MIG wrote: Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. Ah. Last time I faced the extension frustration it was to go to Epsom Downs, which is in the zones. I didn't notice Epsom isn't. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:02 pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: MIG wrote: Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. Ah. Last time I faced the extension frustration it was to go to Epsom Downs, which is in the zones. I didn't notice Epsom isn't. Epsom Downs and Banstead were annexed by the zones within the past 2-3 years or so - the zones used to stop at Belmont. Epsom itself (and Dartford) might make sense for future zonal imperialism. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arthur Figgis wrote:
MIG wrote: On Mar 7, 10:02 pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: MIG wrote: Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. Ah. Last time I faced the extension frustration it was to go to Epsom Downs, which is in the zones. I didn't notice Epsom isn't. Epsom Downs and Banstead were annexed by the zones within the past 2-3 years or so - the zones used to stop at Belmont. Epsom itself (and Dartford) might make sense for future zonal imperialism. Isn't Dartford already "zoned"? -- Moving things in still pictures! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 3:43*pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
Arthur Figgis wrote: MIG wrote: On Mar 7, 10:02 pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: MIG wrote: Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. Ah. *Last time I faced the extension frustration it was to go to Epsom Downs, which is in the zones. *I didn't notice Epsom isn't. Epsom Downs and Banstead were annexed by the zones within the past 2-3 years or so - the zones used to stop at Belmont. Epsom itself (and Dartford) might make sense for future zonal imperialism. Isn't Dartford already "zoned"? No, although I don't quite understand the system for extending zones beyond Greater London. Maybe it depends on when it happened, whether PAYG existed at the time, whether PAYG is accepted etc; it seems to be a bit of a mess. For Watford and the Metropolitan (PAYG accepted) they created zones 7 to 9. For the Central Line (PAYG accepted) they extended zone 6. For various bits of NR, eg Hampton Court, Epsom Downs (PAYG not accepted) they've extended zone 6. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
No, although I don't quite understand the system for extending zones beyond Greater London. Maybe it depends on when it happened, whether PAYG existed at the time, whether PAYG is accepted etc; it seems to be a bit of a mess. For Watford and the Metropolitan (PAYG accepted) they created zones 7 to 9. To be more precise, Watford Junction is not in the zonal system. It is 'beyond zone 8', but not in zone 9, according to the TfL and London Connections maps. Only Amersham and Chesham are in zone 9, Watford Met is in zone 7. However Watford Junction does have a special PAYG fare, so it sets the precedent for any other station that is just outside the zones, but logically fits the PAYG scheme. Paul S |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 6:01*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: MIG wrote: No, although I don't quite understand the system for extending zones beyond Greater London. *Maybe it depends on when it happened, whether PAYG existed at the time, whether PAYG is accepted etc; it seems to be a bit of a mess. For Watford and the Metropolitan (PAYG accepted) they created zones 7 to 9. To be more precise, Watford Junction is not in the zonal system. It is 'beyond zone 8', but not in zone 9, according to the TfL and London Connections maps. Only Amersham and Chesham are in zone 9, Watford Met is in zone 7. Yes, I should have said "the LO Watford line". However Watford Junction does have a special PAYG fare, so it sets the precedent for any other station that is just outside the zones, but logically fits the PAYG scheme. I suppose so, given that it doesn't seem to be restricted to LO services (ie there are now Oyster readers at platforms at Euston that can't be reached by third rail trains). There isn't a self-contained line ending at Dartford, but that doesn't seem to matter. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
On Mar 8, 3:43 pm, ®i©ardo wrote: Arthur Figgis wrote: MIG wrote: On Mar 7, 10:02 pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: MIG wrote: Having to queue for extensions has been a pain for years, but the assumption is probably that with Oyster PAYG the problem will go away. Yes I find it very frustrating because I usually make such journeys off peak and find the desks fill up with people asking for awkward stuff and the queue takes an age. The fact that London Underground machines used to do paper extension tickets (do they still? I've not used one of the machines in yonks) just makes it more annoying that the TOCs don't. That is, the extension to your season is some PAYG credit on the same card, as it would be on a purely LU journey now. That assumes Oyster will be rolled out into the commuter belt beyond Zone 6 though (although for my particular journey there's talk of moving Epsom into the zone - the other stations in the borough were not too long ago) and no-one seems to be talking about this for all the networks at the moment. Ah. Last time I faced the extension frustration it was to go to Epsom Downs, which is in the zones. I didn't notice Epsom isn't. Epsom Downs and Banstead were annexed by the zones within the past 2-3 years or so - the zones used to stop at Belmont. Epsom itself (and Dartford) might make sense for future zonal imperialism. Isn't Dartford already "zoned"? No, although I don't quite understand the system for extending zones beyond Greater London. Maybe it depends on when it happened, whether PAYG existed at the time, whether PAYG is accepted etc; it seems to be a bit of a mess. For Watford and the Metropolitan (PAYG accepted) they created zones 7 to 9. For the Central Line (PAYG accepted) they extended zone 6. For various bits of NR, eg Hampton Court, Epsom Downs (PAYG not accepted) they've extended zone 6. Thanks. I only raised the question because Dartford (and Swanley) seem to indicate the furthest limit of the Oystercard scheme in that particular part of Kent, so I just assumed that they would be part of a zone. Having just been issued with a card under the Veterans' Concessionary Travel Scheme, although I live in Somerset, I've been poring over transport maps of London/Greater London to see just how far I can get for free, once I get off the train at Paddington. My intention is to visit the Royal Engineers Museum which is close to Gillingham station, hence my interest in the extent of the Kentish connection. -- Moving things in still pictures! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|