Never really used it much in my life, but took a detour to see what
they've done to it while it was closed. Seemed a little odd to me -
what was the reasoning behind turning a 2 platform station into a 1
platform station? Were turnaround times and platform congestion so bad
previously that sacrificing a platform was the best option?

Also, has there been any real improvement on facilities? Like I said,
never used it much, but it seemed like there had been no improvements
to what was previously a pretty duff station.

On Mar 8, 6:46*pm, Martin Petrov wrote:
Never really used it much in my life, but took a detour to see what
they've done to it while it was closed. Seemed a little odd to me -
what was the reasoning behind turning a 2 platform station into a 1
platform station? Were turnaround times and platform congestion so bad
previously that sacrificing a platform was the best option?


The problem was insufficient room to extend both of the platforms to 3
car length (which was the primary reason for the rebuild). To make two
3 car platforms would have required widening the viaduct, which would
have been considerably more costly.

"Martin Petrov" wrote in message
...
Never really used it much in my life, but took a detour to see what
they've done to it while it was closed. Seemed a little odd to me -
what was the reasoning behind turning a 2 platform station into a 1
platform station?

Have they lengthened the platform to take 3-unit trains? Originally it was
built for single units, and later lengthened for 2 units. Of course, since
Bank DLR opened most trains go there.

Peter

On Mar 8, 6:46*pm, Martin Petrov wrote:
Never really used it much in my life, but took a detour to see what
they've done to it while it was closed. Seemed a little odd to me -
what was the reasoning behind turning a 2 platform station into a 1
platform station? Were turnaround times and platform congestion so bad
previously that sacrificing a platform was the best option?

Remember the approach to TG was single-track anyway, so the sacrifice
in capacity is not all that dramatic.

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org

Martin Petrov wrote:
Never really used it much in my life, but took a detour to see what
they've done to it while it was closed. Seemed a little odd to me -
what was the reasoning behind turning a 2 platform station into a 1
platform station? Were turnaround times and platform congestion so bad
previously that sacrificing a platform was the best option?

Also, has there been any real improvement on facilities? Like I said,
never used it much, but it seemed like there had been no improvements
to what was previously a pretty duff station.

There's a detailed thread about this on uk.t.l:

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...browse_thread/
thread/cad06b2a59393483#