London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 30th 03, 09:19 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default Public Transport Expansion

In article , Paul Weaver
writes
Looking at the history of the tube, the vast majority of it was built
between 1890 and the first world war. Obviously this was all
entrepreneurs, capitalists that produced the finest public transport
system of its day.

Whats happened since the end of the second world war? Nothing.


Quite a lot.

But you should actually be comparing before- and after-1933, when the
system was nationalised.

New lines since 1933:

Central: all the bits east of Liverpool Street, and the West Ruislip
branch, were planned in the late 1930s and opened after WW2.

H&C: service between Aldgate East and Barking started in 1936.

Jubilee: Baker Street to Finchley Road tunnels opened 1939 (the private
sector having failed to do anything about this bottleneck). The line
south/east of Baker Street is all 1979 or later.

Metropolitan: four-tracking north of Harrow-on-the-Hill and
electrification beyond Rickmansworth are 1960s.

Northern: the bits north of Archway were opened in the late 1930s or
early 1940s.

Piccadilly: Heathrow extension is 1970s & 1980s.

Victoria Line: built in the 1960s.

On a similar note, what geological problems are there preventing massive
tube expansion?


There's so much stuff at medium depth that new lines have to go much
deeper, possibly below the Blue Clay.

--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 1st 03, 06:58 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2003
Posts: 9
Default Public Transport Expansion

In addition to the points already made concerning private enterprise,
it's worth bearing in mind that the tubes that were built in the
immediate wake of the City and South London Line sought to beat the
congestion in Central London caused by roads incapable of dealing with
the huge amount of horse-drawn traffic. In addition, they sought to
break into virgin suburbs in order to profit from suburban traffic.
However, the advent of the internal combustion engine lessened journey
times for all surface vehicles, making Central London sections much
less profitable, and the enormous capital sums required to build tube
lines were not compensated for by ticket receipts (railway companies
were banned from taking advantage of the appreciation in real estate
that resulted).

As a result, it became almost impossible to raise capital for tube
lines in the capital markets after about 1905. Edgar Speyer, a close
associate of Yerkes, informally broached the idea of selling the
Yerkes lines to the L.C.C. about this time, but nothing came of it.
All tube lines (and most other railway extensions, in London at least)
after 1915 and before nationalisation depended on the provision of
government assistance. This mostly consisted of loan guarantees.
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 6th 03, 01:00 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 94
Default Public Transport Expansion

Unless I'm very much mistaken, it was Clive D. W. Feather
), in message
who said:

But you should actually be comparing before- and after-1933, when the
system was nationalised.

New lines since 1933:

Central: all the bits east of Liverpool Street, and the West Ruislip
branch, were planned in the late 1930s and opened after WW2.



A large proportion of which ran over existing track which, funnily enough,
had been developed privately before nationalisation.


H&C: service between Aldgate East and Barking started in 1936.



Eh? That runs *entirely* over the existing network.

FFS, if that's going to be the line of logic, then TfL could introduce a
whole raft of new lines with new names, running over existing bits of the
network, and then claim expansion.


Jubilee: Baker Street to Finchley Road tunnels opened 1939 (the
private sector having failed to do anything about this bottleneck).
The line south/east of Baker Street is all 1979 or later.

Metropolitan: four-tracking north of Harrow-on-the-Hill and
electrification beyond Rickmansworth are 1960s.

Northern: the bits north of Archway were opened in the late 1930s or
early 1940s.



Over existing lines again.


Piccadilly: Heathrow extension is 1970s & 1980s.

Victoria Line: built in the 1960s.



The Vic and the Jubilee extension have been the only enhancements to the
system on a scale similar to the achievements of the 1863-1910 period.

BTN


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pedicabs: a public nuisance on the public highway Robin9 London Transport 13 December 26th 11 07:23 PM
Why People Won't Use Public Transport in London CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North London Transport 34 February 16th 04 10:00 PM
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. Gordon Joly London Transport 9 January 3rd 04 02:58 PM
Public transport in London in 18*7*9 MorrisJ2 London Transport 1 November 9th 03 06:33 AM
Public transport in London in 1829 Anoracart London Transport 6 November 7th 03 04:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017