Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 25 Mar, 23:17, "Peter Masson" wrote: wrote I thought the plans for T6 put it in place of T123 , with a T5A & B being built first. I'm not sure of BAA's intended timescales, but 'Heathrow Central' would be a new terminal on the site of and replacing T123, while T6 will be adjacent to the railway between Hayes & Harlington and T123. Accordingly, with three stops HEx and Crossrail trains will be able to serve T6, Heathrow Central and T5, or T6, Heathrow Central, and T4. Do LUL have any plans to get the Piccadilly Line to T6, and if so, how? I'd think any such plans would basically be advanced by BAA as opposed to LUL these days - that's broadly how the tube extension to T5 came about. Of course LUL would be integrally involved in any such plans - e.g. working out how the new service would run - but the model of how things were done with T5, where BAA paid for the extension and then got it built, would surely be followed. Apart from anything else it's hard to see any Mayor of London exercising themselves or indeed the TfL budget over serving a new airport terminal they don't want (and I can't really see any future Mayor adopting a fundamentally different policy on this). |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 1:43*pm, wrote:
On Mar 24, 8:40*am, wrote: [snip] Unless HS2 is run by idiots, the trains will still go on to Euston. You are making a LOT of sense. *Thanks for posting. Thank you. I did a bit more thinking about this, and while I think the trains _should_ go on to Euston, I'm now of the opinion that David Rowlands might be serious in terminating them short at Old Oak. The reason is simple: gauge clearances. It's going to cost a pretty penny to get the Camden tunnels cleared for LGV gauge. There is a solution though, and it's staring us in the face. You need to build the short connecting tunnel between Old Oak and Kensal Green anyway so that you can link HS1 to HS2 effectively, but don't, for the time being, run double-deck trains through it. Instead, divert a bunch of 'regular' trains that would have terminated at Paddington into it (say, whichever lines have finally landed up electrified by then), and use the space freed up at Paddington for your new supertrains. There are far fewer gauge issues between Old Oak and Paddington than there are between Kensal Green and Euston. But personally, I'd just go through the pain of enlarging the Camden tunnels. (Just don't expect any of this to actually happen. *We are talking about the UK DfT!) True, but given that all major parties are in favour, it's actually got a decent shot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New years day service - or lack thereof | London Transport | |||
(Times): Britain to have fastest train service in the worldwithin 12 years | London Transport | |||
(Times): Britain to have fastest train service in the worldwithin 12 years | London Transport | |||
Camden Town revisited - many times, many,many times | London Transport | |||
SWT New years morning service | London Transport |