Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:14:37 +0100
rail wrote: In message "Chris Read" wrote: I've just watched the latest Video 125 drivers eye view, of the Victoria line. Included as a bonus was some archive film covering the construction and opening of the line. It appears that, from the outset, there were CCTV screens at platform end, giving operators a view of the platform. However, no mention was made of the purpose served by this facility. So, was the Victoria line one person operated from the outset, or did the screens serve some other purpose, and if so, what? Yes it was. Train operation was completely automatic so the 'driver' operated the doors and pressed a button to start the train and let it get on with it. Well not completely if the doors are manual. Examples of 100% ATO would be the VAL systems in france and line 14 in paris, where there is no driver or any staff whatsoever on board the train and everything is 100% automatic. Not so bad not having staff on those systems because the tunnels are usually double track so not so much of a sense of being trapped, but in single bore tube tunnels it wouldn't be pleasent if the train broke down and no one was on board to sort it out. B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
I'm Always Amazed At How *PHONY* The Protocols Are | London Transport | |||
Always touch out | London Transport | |||
Is it always that bad? | London Transport |