Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Recliner" wrote: "Chris Read" wrote in message Thanks all. I had thought that DOO on the tube was a 1980s phenomenon. The Victoria stock uses a very simple 1960s system that's quite different to that used in modern ATO trains. From memory, trains run at either a standard restricted speed, or flat out, with no finer controls. There were four control codes used: 420 ppm up to line speed 270 ppm up to 25mph 180 ppm coasting up to 25mph 120 ppm used in connection with signalling for the 270 code there is a governor that regulated the speed between 21 and 23 mph. Over 25mph and the emergency brakes would come on automatically. A seperate 15kHz signal indicated points where power could be shut off and the train allowed to coast. As it approached the next station there were a succession of command codes to slow the train down. Codes were calculated at 100Hz/mph so 35mph had a code of 3.5kHz. There were 3 rates of breaking providied by mercury retarder switches down to 4mph at which pont a constant pressure control took over to ease the braking to a smooth stop. Very sophisticated for the time; remember, practical ICs were a decade or more in the future. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
I'm Always Amazed At How *PHONY* The Protocols Are | London Transport | |||
Always touch out | London Transport | |||
Is it always that bad? | London Transport |