Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Recliner wrote: wrote in message On Apr 2, 7:41 pm, "Michael R N Dolbear" wrote: Some 1940-1946 airliners, eg DC-3s Dakotas C-47s remain in constant daily use even if this is sightseeing. Not in the UK any more. They were stopped last year. I'm not sure the precise reason but AIUI it was a CAA directive or similar. The reason given (which may or may not be entirely true) was an EU safety directive which has all sorts of sensible rules when applied to modern airliners, but most of which would irrelevant to Dakotas. However, I suspect that if they were making enough money from them to care, they'd have found a loophole or two. Would have required serious mods to the airframe which would have compromised originality - another pointer to these machines being preserved. More to the point, the original Boeing 737 and DC-9 airliners were introduced at the same time as the 1967 stock. I don't think any of those early models remain in service. The Boeing 747 came along a couple of years later, and all of its early examples are also long-retired. To be fair, the weeking out of early 737s, DC9s, 727s and others (BAC-111, De Havilland Gripper^W Trident) was more down to airport noise restrictions than anything else. If the same had been applied to the railways we'd have seen the back of pretty much any locomotive pre-Class 60 (and probably HST to boot) at the same time.. The airliner (well, feederliner) of that era which /is/ still going, and with many of the early examples still in use (I think..) And I can't remember when I last saw a first generation Ford Escort from the same era. Ooh. 10:40 today. White Mk.1, only mildly rally-modded. -- Andy Breen ~ Speaking for myself, not the University of Wales "your suggestion rates at four monkeys for six weeks" (Peter D. Rieden) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andrew Robert Breen wrote: In article , Recliner wrote: More to the point, the original Boeing 737 and DC-9 airliners were introduced at the same time as the 1967 stock. I don't think any of those early models remain in service. The Boeing 747 came along a couple of years later, and all of its early examples are also long-retired. snip.. The airliner (well, feederliner) of that era which /is/ still going, and with many of the early examples still in use (I think..) Duh. Forgot to finish sentence. Posting while very very tired. it should have continued.. "is the Brittan-Norman Trislander, which still seems to be doing stuff up in Scotland, just like they were in the mid-70s. -- Andy Breen, not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales "The internet, that wonderful tool for bringing us into contact with things that make us wish we could scrub our brains out with dental floss.." (Charlie Stross) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rail" wrote in message
... Air Aurigny, or its successor, still operate one between Southampton and Alderney, or were till recently. Quick follow up, they still operate a fleet of 8 apparently. -- Is that because Alderney, or the Bailiwick of Guernsey, is not in the European Union, and thus not subject to the same operating rules? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
wrote: "rail" wrote in message ... Air Aurigny, or its successor, still operate one between Southampton and Alderney, or were till recently. Quick follow up, they still operate a fleet of 8 apparently. -- Is that because Alderney, or the Bailiwick of Guernsey, is not in the European Union, and thus not subject to the same operating rules? Could be, or possibly they are to small (17 seats IIRC) and fly too low (service ceiling is 4000m) to come under the regs. Certainly the Channel Isles are not in the EU. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
I'm Always Amazed At How *PHONY* The Protocols Are | London Transport | |||
Always touch out | London Transport | |||
Is it always that bad? | London Transport |