Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Tony Polson wrote: "Recliner" wrote: "Stimpy" wrote in message .co.uk On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:39:55 +0100, Recliner wrote And I can't remember when I last saw a first generation Ford Escort from the same era. My mate a mile up the valley from here has one in his garage. Of course, if it spends most/all of its time in his garage it rather proves my point about any other surviving 1960s machines being treated as preserved equipment, rather than being in full-time use like the 1967 stock. It is hardly valid to compare a car, built to a design life of ~60,000 miles and ~5 years, with a train, built to a design life of many millions of miles and ~30 years. I thought Ford cars of that era were built with a design life of warranty period plus 1 day... -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line - always DOO? | London Transport | |||
I'm Always Amazed At How *PHONY* The Protocols Are | London Transport | |||
Always touch out | London Transport | |||
Is it always that bad? | London Transport |