Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Of course the ferry offers rather better views than the glazed white tiles of the tunnel! Has anyone ever attempted to romanticise the journey a la Staten Island, or would that be a task too far? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Apr 7, 11:59*pm, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: Mizter T wrote: Of course the ferry offers rather better views than the glazed white tiles of the tunnel! Has anyone ever attempted to romanticise the journey a la Staten Island, or would that be a task too far? I've never come across anything like that, but I remember it feeling quite romantic when I used it in the fresh early morning of a summer's day a while back - the glistening Thames Barrier, the gleaming towers of the Docklands in the distance, the seagulls swooping over the river etc! I was glad I hadn't gone 'through the pipe' (the Blackwall Tunnel) on that occasion. I doubt it's quite so much fun during the rush hour! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ferry is now operated by Serco on contract from TfL, IIRC for about
£7m a year. There are undoubtedly longterm plans to replace both the boats and the linkspans, in which the machinery regularly shows that it is life-expired. Since the linkspans were built as one-offs [or should that be four-offs, to be strictly accurate?] in the early 60s, replacement components are difficult to find, to say the least. When they are replaced, the work is likely to be much easier than it was 40 years ago for a number of reasons: - improvements in linkspan design, construction and reliability, with companies such as Sweden's TTS at the fore - advances in civil engineering techniques - huge increase in knowledge of the river, the river bed and the ground below acquired through the building of the Thames Barrier and more recently the DLR extension to WA But I'm not sure of the timescale. Is there any more info? On 2009-04-05 21:44:38 +0100, said: The current boats are now over 45 years old, and must be coming towards the end of their life. What is going to happen to the derry, will new boats be built, will it be replaced by a new bridge or tunnel, or will it simply be closed? Also, when riding on the 180 bus, between Lewisham and Abbey Wood, I've noticed two enclosed areas of water just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating. Only the Easternmost of these can easily be seen from the bus, as the other is largely hidden by a building, but they can both be seen on Google Earth, and there is some sort of building between them. The water in them seems to be separated from the river by a concrete wall now, but they look rather like small dry docks. were they used to maintain the old ferries possibly; they look about the right size, and if so why were they walled off from the river? Or were they something completely different? -- Writer / editor on London's River |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 9:44*pm, wrote:
The current boats are now over 45 years old, and must be coming towards the end of their life. *What is going to happen to the derry, will new boats be built, will it be replaced by a new bridge or tunnel, or will it simply be closed? Also, when riding on the 180 bus, between Lewisham and Abbey Wood, I've noticed two enclosed areas of water just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating. * When I last used the ferries frequently there were three boats, and therefore always at least one parked. (Called John Burns, Ernest Bevin and James Newman as I recall.) |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Also, when riding on the 180 bus, between Lewisham and Abbey Wood, I've noticed two enclosed areas of water just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating. * When I last used the ferries frequently there were three boats, and therefore always at least one parked. (Called John Burns, Ernest Bevin and James Newman as I recall.) It's correct that there are three boats, but to say "just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating" is also correct! The normal weekday service is provided by two boats, with the third undergoing maintenance and tied up next to the workshops EAST of the ferry. When only one boat is operated, usually on Sundays, the spare operational boat is moored in the river just WEST of the ferry terminal. Peter |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Heather wrote:
It's correct that there are three boats Google Maps shows 4! I can't see the join, either... |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 12:39*pm, Peter Heather wrote:
Also, when riding on the 180 bus, between Lewisham and Abbey Wood, I've noticed two enclosed areas of water just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating. * When I last used the ferries frequently there were three boats, and therefore always at least one parked. (Called John Burns, Ernest Bevin and James Newman as I recall.) It's correct that there are three boats, but to say "just to the west of the ferry, close to where the spare boat is kept when a single boat service is operating" is also correct! The normal weekday service is provided by two boats, with the third undergoing maintenance and tied up next to the workshops EAST of the ferry. When only one boat is operated, usually on Sundays, the spare operational boat is moored in the river just WEST of the ferry terminal. Peter For some reason I can't remember anything ever being parked to the east, but it could be either that my memory is no good after twenty years or that they have changed. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Apr 12, 2:01*pm, "John Rowland" wrote: Peter Heather wrote: It's correct that there are three boats Google Maps shows 4! I can't see the join, either... Definitely only three. Unless they've managed to hide one all these years - perhaps it's part of the strategic battleplan for London should the third world nuclear war come, where one of the boats would sail up to central London to collect VIPs for evacuation - in days of yore perhaps GLC bigwigs from County Hall? Maybe the annual trip up the river with disadvantaged kids is actually cover for a training exercise... In which case, what's the fourth boat called then? Clem Attlee? |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
When I last used the ferries frequently there were three boats, and therefore always at least one parked. (Called John Burns, Ernest Bevin and James Newman as I recall.) That was the situation when I took the ferry on Thursday - IIRC it was John Burns that was dry moored on a wooden platform on the south side, in the gap between the bank and the landing point. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No Woolwich Ferry because of fog? | London Transport | |||
Woolwich Ferry question | London Transport | |||
London Red D/Deckers on the Woolwich Ferry? | London Transport | |||
Boris approves third Blackwall tunnel and new ferry in Thamesmead | London Transport | |||
Woolwich Ferry question | London Transport |