Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Apr, 02:23, wrote:
In article , (asdf) wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:37:36 +0100, Paul Corfield wrote: Also, isn't it still illegal to protest outside Parliament? (Not that I agree with that law, but I'm surprised not to have seen it mentioned at all in media reports, or in these Usenet threads. The police certainly used to be very active in enforcing it.) Didn't the chap who has been there for years appeal against an order that was issued for his removal and didn't the judges find that the law contravened the Human Rights Act (or something similar)? In other words the legislation cannot be applied. * [I may be 100% wrong here!] I thought that he won the case on the grounds that his protest had started before the law was enacted, so he couldn't be prosecuted because it would be a retrospective application of the law. If you are referring to Brian Haw then that is correct. The Serious Organised Crime Act included the ban on demos in Parliament Square (obviously, given its title!). Its main effect seems to have been to encourage more of them. That part of the Act has been under review and this repressive, criminalising legislation ought to be repealed by government ASAP. http://www.publications.parliament.u...s/47/4702..htm "ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF PROTESTS 128. One of the innovations of SOCPA was the requirement for protests to be notified in advance to the police, so that they could then be authorised. A consequence of this approach has been the criminalisation of peaceful protestors, such as Ms Evans and Mr Rai, and the outlawing of spontaneous protest.[233] Elsewhere in this Report we set out the advantages of protestors and police engaging in dialogue, to ensure that protests run smoothly and safely. These benefits apply equally to protest around Parliament but we are not persuaded that a legal requirement to notify protests in advance is necessary or proportionate to maintain access to Parliament or to achieve any other legitimate aim. Advance notification of protest around Parliament should be encouraged by the Metropolitan Police, in order to facilitate safe protest, but should not be a legal requirement and no sanction should apply to those who choose not to notify the police of their intention to protest solely by reason of that choice." -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net One man's democracy is another man's regime. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Your Oyster card has been stopped... | London Transport | |||
Stopped Oyster card reason codes | London Transport | |||
Oystercard stopped working | London Transport | |||
New National Security Technology ignored that might have stopped the bombing | London Transport | |||
Disabled 'to sue for Tube access' | London Transport |