Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "1506" wrote in message ... On May 5, 8:40 am, "Pat O'Neill" wrote: http://patrickoneill204.fotopic.net/p58004145.html "Perfick", beautiful. These remind me of my teenage years in London. The '38 stock was truly iconic. I saw the Standard stock in NSE. Must say that it seemed to work to my eye. I find the yellow front, just a solid colour block set against the red quite overwhelming. A little bit of lining and styling to soften the edginess I think would serve the stock well. The fronts used to be red, so perhaps the yellow could actually be made into 3 rounded cornered rectangles occupying most of the front surface. DW down under |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
wrote: "rail" wrote in message ... In message wrote: "Tony Polson" wrote in message ... Charles Ellson wrote: AFAIR another reason for the continuing use of older tube stock is that the motors and underfloor equipment on newer types would need extra protection against salt spray at Ryde Pier, the alternative being truncation of the service away from the sea. Yet the busiest sector of the Island Line - by far - is the one between Ryde Pier and Ryde Esplanade. Have they thought of perhaps running some sort of shuttle service from Ryde Pier Head to Ryde Esplanade, allowing passengers to transfer to other rolling stock? My guess is that this would not really be feasible, however. There used to be a tramway shuttle that did exactly that back in the dim and distant. The tracks were between the railway line proper and the roadway out to the pierhead. Something like the Hythe Pier Railway? IIRC both utilised petrol engined traction. Why don't they do that, if corrosion is going to be such a concern on newer models? You've still got corosion problems for a tram, if you can solve that you can presumably solve it for a train. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rail" wrote in message ... In message wrote: "rail" wrote in message ... In message wrote: "Tony Polson" wrote in message ... Charles Ellson wrote: AFAIR another reason for the continuing use of older tube stock is that the motors and underfloor equipment on newer types would need extra protection against salt spray at Ryde Pier, the alternative being truncation of the service away from the sea. Yet the busiest sector of the Island Line - by far - is the one between Ryde Pier and Ryde Esplanade. Have they thought of perhaps running some sort of shuttle service from Ryde Pier Head to Ryde Esplanade, allowing passengers to transfer to other rolling stock? My guess is that this would not really be feasible, however. There used to be a tramway shuttle that did exactly that back in the dim and distant. The tracks were between the railway line proper and the roadway out to the pierhead. Something like the Hythe Pier Railway? IIRC both utilised petrol engined traction. Why don't they do that, if corrosion is going to be such a concern on newer models? You've still got corosion problems for a tram, if you can solve that you can presumably solve it for a train. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail You know, a horse-drawn wooden tram (I originally wrote wooden horse tram, hmmm ... ) would be very much a touristy, novelty thing. No problems with tripcocks, corrosion - well it can be dealt with. If Victor Harbour in South Australia can have one out across a jetty/bridge/pier type structure, so can the Isle of Wight. Of course, the animal libbers could end up lying across the tracks - unless you perhaps had a lovely Clydesdale there with a brewery dray and a nice drop on tap!! In which case they'd still be lying across the tracks, paralytic rather than politic. ![]() |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"DW downunder" noname wrote: [snip] You know, a horse-drawn wooden tram (I originally wrote wooden horse tram, hmmm ... ) As used in Troy? would be very much a touristy, novelty thing. No problems with tripcocks, corrosion - well it can be dealt with. If Victor Harbour in South Australia can have one out across a jetty/bridge/pier type structure, so can the Isle of Wight. Of course, the animal libbers could end up lying across the tracks Promise? *- unless you perhaps had a lovely Clydesdale there with a brewery dray and a nice drop on tap!! In which case they'd still be lying across the tracks, paralytic rather than politic. ![]() The trouble is the island beer is much what you would expect from a Clydesdale :-( I've now posted the promised pics of the Standard Stock (class 485) on the island. Also a couple of shots of the 1938 stock in Network South East livery. http://my.fotopic.net/collection/01694014/index.html t the same time I've posted a collection of oictures of the colourful Hong Kong trams at: http://my.fotopic.net/collection/01693996/index.html -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rail" wrote in message ... In message "DW downunder" noname wrote: [snip] You know, a horse-drawn wooden tram (I originally wrote wooden horse tram, hmmm ... ) As used in Troy? would be very much a touristy, novelty thing. No problems with tripcocks, corrosion - well it can be dealt with. If Victor Harbour in South Australia can have one out across a jetty/bridge/pier type structure, so can the Isle of Wight. Of course, the animal libbers could end up lying across the tracks Promise? - unless you perhaps had a lovely Clydesdale there with a brewery dray and a nice drop on tap!! In which case they'd still be lying across the tracks, paralytic rather than politic. ![]() The trouble is the island beer is much what you would expect from a Clydesdale :-( Are you suggesting animal libbers are discerning about their ales? ![]() I've now posted the promised pics of the Standard Stock (class 485) on the island. Also a couple of shots of the 1938 stock in Network South East livery. http://my.fotopic.net/collection/01694014/index.html It wanted me to login .... sure the URL's correct? Likewise for the next one .... t the same time I've posted a collection of oictures of the colourful Hong Kong trams at: http://my.fotopic.net/collection/01693996/index.html -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
rail wrote: [snip] I've now posted the promised pics of the Standard Stock (class 485) on the island. Also a couple of shots of the 1938 stock in Network South East livery. Doh! That should be: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/collection/1694014/index.html t the same time I've posted a collection of pictures of the colourful Hong Kong trams at: And this should be: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/collection/1693996/index.html -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rail" wrote in message ... In message rail wrote: [snip] I've now posted the promised pics of the Standard Stock (class 485) on the island. Also a couple of shots of the 1938 stock in Network South East livery. Doh! That should be: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/collection/1694014/index.html And it gets us: 404: Page Not found We're sorry but we couldn't find the file you requested: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/colle...014/index.html So either it doesn't exist, or it's been moved. If you're looking for a particular person's gallery, you could try looking at our Community section, or alternatively take a look at the main Fotopic site. t the same time I've posted a collection of pictures of the colourful Hong Kong trams at: And this should be: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/collection/1693996/index.html and that got: 404: Page Not found We're sorry but we couldn't find the file you requested: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/colle...996/index.html So either it doesn't exist, or it's been moved. If you're looking for a particular person's gallery, you could try looking at our Community section, or alternatively take a look at the main Fotopic site I'd love to see them. Should bring back memories. David down under -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"DW downunder" noname wrote: "rail" wrote in message ... In message rail wrote: [snip] I've now posted the promised pics of the Standard Stock (class 485) on the island. Also a couple of shots of the 1938 stock in Network South East livery. Doh! That should be: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/collection/1694014/index.html And it gets us: 404: Page Not found [snip] Brain is obviously in neutral today, third time lucky: Isle of Wight tube trains at: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/c1694014.html Hong Kong Trams at: http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/c1693996.html Or follow the links from the page in my sig. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I doubt there are many scrap value 70 year old trams for cheap sale like their were tube trains ![]() Budapest's BKV are in the process of modernising their hideously antiquated tram & metro system - most of the (soon-to-be) redundant stock is approaching 70 years old ... M |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 4:26*am, "DW downunder" noname wrote:
"1506" wrote in message ... On May 5, 8:40 am, "Pat O'Neill" wrote: http://patrickoneill204.fotopic.net/p58004145.html "Perfick", beautiful. *These remind me of my teenage years in London. The '38 stock was truly iconic. I saw the Standard stock in NSE. Must say that it seemed to work to my eye. I find the yellow front, just a solid colour block set against the red quite overwhelming. A little bit of lining and styling to soften the edginess I think would serve the stock well. The fronts used to be red, so perhaps the yellow could actually be made into 3 rounded cornered rectangles occupying most of the front surface. DW down under Pount taken. I wish they did not have the yellow ends. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Piccys from the IOW | London Transport | |||
IOW today | London Transport |