Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 03:06:34 on Sat, 16 May 2009, Mr Thant remarked: Wow. I didn't realise it was going to grow out of the water like that. How is it connected to dry land on the side we can't see? Two little bridges like on the side we can, or more? The bridges on this side don't seem like a lot of capacity for such a major station. Diagram he http://tinyurl.com/ojt5nc And the railway lines - deep underground I suppose (below the docks). -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 May, 11:52, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 03:06:34 on Sat, 16 May 2009, Mr Thant And the railway lines - deep underground I suppose (below the docks). Yes: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt U |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 06:24:04 on Sat, 16 May 2009, Mr Thant remarked: And the railway lines - deep underground I suppose (below the docks). Yes: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt Very revealing. Four floors of retail, then ticket hall below that and the platforms below that. I was wondering why they needed such a long building if the trains were below the surface. RETAIL! -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 06:24:04 on Sat, 16 May 2009, Mr Thant remarked: And the railway lines - deep underground I suppose (below the docks). Yes: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt Very revealing. Four floors of retail, then ticket hall below that and the platforms below that. I was wondering why they needed such a long building if the trains were below the surface. RETAIL! Maybe they wouldn't be allowed to have platforms below water. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:04:13 on Sat, 16
May 2009, John Rowland remarked: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt Very revealing. Four floors of retail, then ticket hall below that and the platforms below that. I was wondering why they needed such a long building if the trains were below the surface. RETAIL! Maybe they wouldn't be allowed to have platforms below water. They are below water, just like the Jubilee line station. Having built on every scrap of land they are now building on the old docks - so inconsiderate for someone to have dug them in the first place. -- Roland Perry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:04:13 on Sat, 16 May 2009, John Rowland remarked: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt Very revealing. Four floors of retail, then ticket hall below that and the platforms below that. I was wondering why they needed such a long building if the trains were below the surface. RETAIL! Maybe they wouldn't be allowed to have platforms below water. They are below water, just like the Jubilee line station. The Jubilee Line station looks like it's entirely below ex-water to me. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 15:04:13 on Sat, 16 May 2009, John Rowland remarked: http://tinyurl.com/q8spkt Very revealing. Four floors of retail, then ticket hall below that and the platforms below that. I was wondering why they needed such a long building if the trains were below the surface. RETAIL! Maybe they wouldn't be allowed to have platforms below water. They are below water, just like the Jubilee line station. The Jubilee Line station looks like it's entirely below ex-water to me. In fact, IIRC they had originally planned teh Jubilee station to be beneath water except for the two entrance pods, but H&S had kittens and they were forced to turn the area between the pods into a park. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:19:56 on Sat, 16
May 2009, John Rowland remarked: Maybe they wouldn't be allowed to have platforms below water. They are below water, just like the Jubilee line station. The Jubilee Line station looks like it's entirely below ex-water to me. I can assure you that the top half of the escalators down to the booking hall, and the canopies over the entrances, are above water! -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 12:06:12
on Sat, 16 May 2009, remarked: Having built on every scrap of land they are now building on the old docks - so inconsiderate for someone to have dug them in the first place. Why? It's not as if the docks are required for shipping any more. They are part of the landscape. If not, why didn't they just fill them in when they started building the area - it would have been so much simpler. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Investigation under way after Tube train collision | London Transport | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
BBC - Soho shops make way for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
the book...London under London | London Transport |