London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 21st 09, 04:55 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2009
Posts: 1
Default Photography diplomatic incident

On 2009-05-21, MIG wrote:

As was alluded to elsewhere, taking a snap doesn't really get a person
any closer to being able to target a particular child.

CCTV, on the other hand, does. Any low-paid worker in CCTV control
can spot a child waiting with a football kit bag at the same corner
every week and learn enough (to sell to whoever) to be able to say
"your dad's blue Mondeo broke down and he asked me to pick you up from
football; he said you won last week" etc etc.

So why all the fuss about taking snaps and not about the fact that
CCTV is a genuine threat to your children? Bizarre.


I suppose because CCTV seems impersonal: you don't see the person
"behind" the camera. That's irrational, of course; you can see the
photographer and judge whether he looks respectable, whereas you can't
tell whether there's a drooling menace in the surveillance room.
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 09, 12:10 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,392
Default Photography diplomatic incident

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 05:55:46PM +0100, Adam Funk wrote:

I suppose because CCTV seems impersonal: you don't see the person
"behind" the camera. That's irrational, of course; you can see the
photographer and judge whether he looks respectable, whereas you can't
tell whether there's a drooling menace in the surveillance room.


And respectable-looking people never do anything wrong, do they:

http://www.biography.com/notorious/i...ld-shipman.jpg

--
David Cantrell | Nth greatest programmer in the world

Wow, my first sigquoting! I feel so special now!
-- Dan Sugalski
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 09, 12:15 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 60
Default Photography diplomatic incident

On May 22, 1:10*pm, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 05:55:46PM +0100, Adam Funk wrote:
I suppose because CCTV seems impersonal: you don't see the person
"behind" the camera. *That's irrational, of course; you can see the
photographer and judge whether he looks respectable, whereas you can't
tell whether there's a drooling menace in the surveillance room.


And respectable-looking people never do anything wrong, do they:

http://www.biography.com/notorious/i...ld-shipman.jpg


Please can you not post photographs of Tony Polson to the group?
kthxbye

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photography diplomatic incident 1506 London Transport 0 May 15th 09 09:02 PM
This Photography Lark is Getting Ridiculous Ian Jelf London Transport 55 May 14th 08 10:04 AM
Idea (LU photography permits) alex_t London Transport 3 May 11th 07 05:35 PM
Photography underground alex_t London Transport 42 March 16th 07 05:41 PM
Photography on LU [email protected] London Transport 13 December 29th 06 10:44 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017