Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:07:31 +0100
Chris Tolley (ukonline really) wrote: Peter Beale wrote: 1506 wrote: AFIK extending the Bakerloo is fading back into obscurity. I don't see any negative issues. But mixing tube with mainline and subsurface stoke means that the platforms have to be compromise height. Better in my view to keep the Bakerloo as is, and extend the East London Line. That didn't seem to be a problem for the 65 years (1917-1982) that the Bakerloo ran to Watford Junction. And of course it remains the situation from Queens Park to Harrow & Wealdstone. That's true, but we have a more enlightened attitude to disabled passengers than our predecessors, so it isn't persuasive. So if disabled can't be accomodated then the best solution is that no one is? Is that what you're saying? B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An open letter regarding Croxley Rail link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link - Position Update October 2007 | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link Petition | London Transport | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK - POSITION UPDATE - February 2007 | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport |