Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 May, 17:50, wrote:
But isn't the eventual plan that the suburban services will gain new 8 car trains, whilst the longer distance services will gain 12 car trains. This will lead to a separation in the rolling stock at least. Things we know: - All trains via London Bridge will be 12 car, to maximize capacity - All (or most) trains via Elephant will be 8 car, due to platform lengths at the inner south London stations - All trains stopping at Kentish Town or Cricklewood will need to be 8 car, due to platform lengths. - All other inner (and outer) stations are being lengthened to 12 cars I think the likely outcome is off-peak, the "metro" services are 8 cars and call all stops, but during the peaks many of the 12 car trains make various calls at the inner MML stations (except KT and CW). The question is surely whether the service has to be completely separate or whether the suburban section can be specified by TfL as a signatory to the franchise, with a suitable arrangement of fare allocations. Exactly. Splitting the operations between separate companies doesn't necessarily make much sense. There are a few inner suburban trains that run to / from Letchworth during the peaks. Checking the new timetable, they now only do this during the off- peaks. I thought they'd stopped doing ti completely. U |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NR-only season tickets in London (was: Would it be lawful for non-London train and bus operators to share revenue?) | London Transport | |||
How much revenue is lost through passengers with no tickets on bendibuses | London Transport | |||
Revenue sharing between TfL and TOCs | London Transport | |||
Largest Bus Allocation | London Transport | |||
Revenue protection | London Transport |