Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 4, 5:56 pm, 1506 wrote:
There would be some merit in a Euston to Aylesbury Parkway service, leaving Chiltern to focus on their Birmingham route. I rather like the prospect of eventually having two Euston-Milton Keynes services, via Aylesbury and via Watford. But the public might prefer a choice of London termini. Tim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 5, 5:44*am, TimB wrote:
On Jun 4, 5:56 pm, 1506 wrote: There would be some merit in a Euston to Aylesbury Parkway service, leaving Chiltern to focus on their Birmingham route. I rather like the prospect of eventually having two Euston-Milton Keynes services, via Aylesbury and via Watford. But the public might prefer a choice of London termini. * Tim There would plenty of interchanges with the Met. And, Baker St is very close to Marylebone. :-) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, John Rowland wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, 1506 wrote: On Jun 3, 1:10 pm, Mizter T wrote: Though I think platform space at Marylebone is a bit tight too nowadays. It certainly is which is good. If Chiltern continues to expand and improve they will need more space for London bound trains. Stick another deck on top of Marylebone, in a slightly St Pancras style? You'd have to lift the roof a bit to fit them in, but not by much. Or you could build them beyond the end of the shed, in a more St Pancras style. You'd have to sever Rossmore Road to make this work, but you know, omelettes, eggs. Or, of course, you could dive, and build some platforms in tunnel. And sever the Regents Canal? Underground locks. At one time I thought a new ariel curve above Neasden to carry services to Saint Pancras by way of Cricklewood might be an answer. But St P. is now full. Paddington is hardly an option. It is also well utilized. People keep telling me Euston has capacity. Difficult connection to make, though. No: you build a curve from Northwick Park to South Kenton and divert all Chiltern Amersham trains through it to Euston, and sell off the Chiltern tracks from Northwick Park to Neasden. No, use them for an extension of the Brent Cross light rail. tom -- Women are monsters, men are clueless, everyone fights and no-one ever wins. -- cleanskies |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, John Rowland wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: Or, of course, you could dive, and build some platforms in tunnel. And sever the Regents Canal? Underground locks. I had a bit of a look to see if there was such a thing as an underground lock, and i couldn't quite find any, although i did find an underground inclined plane: http://www.d.lane.btinternet.co.uk/canal2.htm Does anyone know of an actual underground lock? tom -- non, scarecrow, forensics, rituals, bacteria, scientific instruments, .. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Anderson" wrote in message rth.li... On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, John Rowland wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: Or, of course, you could dive, and build some platforms in tunnel. And sever the Regents Canal? Underground locks. I had a bit of a look to see if there was such a thing as an underground lock, and i couldn't quite find any, although i did find an underground inclined plane: http://www.d.lane.btinternet.co.uk/canal2.htm Does anyone know of an actual underground lock? No, but this might help. Depending on the required gradient on the tracks, you could conceivably cross the canal on the near level, traditionally this would have involved a swing bridge. However a 'drop lock' (or sump lock) has been provided for the Forth and Clyde restoration to allow the canal to effectively burrow under a road, the same could be done under a railway: http://www.gentles.info/link/Drop_Lock/Drop_Lock.htm Paul S |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote on 07 June 2009 18:23:07 ...
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, John Rowland wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: Or, of course, you could dive, and build some platforms in tunnel. And sever the Regents Canal? Underground locks. I had a bit of a look to see if there was such a thing as an underground lock, and i couldn't quite find any, although i did find an underground inclined plane: http://www.d.lane.btinternet.co.uk/canal2.htm Does anyone know of an actual underground lock? There's one in Manchester, near Piccadilly station. Photo at http://www.flickr.com/photos/binaryape/92608490/ -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chiltern's plans for Oxford-Princes Risborough via Cowley (long!) | London Transport | |||
Chiltern Services Between Amersham & Harrow | London Transport | |||
Chiltern & the online live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Chiltern line at Marylebone this Evening | London Transport | |||
Chiltern plans for West Hampstead | London Transport |