Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote:
On Jun 10, 11:33*pm, asdf wrote: On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:33:12 +0100, Paul Corfield wrote: It is very odd that the TfL website doesn't seem to deal with Overground service status terribly well. It looks like the NLL and Euston Watfords are suffering a bit "due to an unusually large passenger flow" - what a lovely turn of phrase. They're crowded enough in the a.m. peak on a normal day (to the point of people regularly being left behind on the platform) - I was a bit surprised that media reports were emphasising that the route was running, as most people wouldn't have a hope of getting on. I know the NLL is crazy busy during morning and evening peaks, but how hectic does is get on the DC line? Actually, I neglected to mention that I was writing that about the DC line (though I bet the NLL wasn't pretty either). |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 June, 23:33, asdf wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:33:12 +0100, Paul Corfield wrote: It is very odd that the TfL website doesn't seem to deal with Overground service status terribly well. It looks like the NLL and Euston Watfords are suffering a bit "due to an unusually large passenger flow" - what a lovely turn of phrase. They're crowded enough in the a.m. peak on a normal day (to the point of people regularly being left behind on the platform) - I was a bit surprised that media reports were emphasising that the route was running, as most people wouldn't have a hope of getting on. And on top of the strike, the London Midland service was well and truly stuffed by a signal failure in the Carpenders Park area. So I imagine the sport of "how many people can you fit in a 313?" was well practised this morning. Apparantly LO are running additional services Harrow & Wealdstone - Kilburn High Road, to take some of the load off. There was certainly a 313 in Harrow sidings yesterday morning and there platform displays were advertising the service this morning too. From experience, the LO trains are full on the Euston to/from about Willesden / Wembley section during a normal peak, but you can usually get on. As soon as there is any disruption to either the London Midland or Bakerloo services, you'd be hard put to get on at intermediate stations. Yesterday things wouldn't have been helped by the lack of Southern services, as these are quite busy on Watford - Shepherds Bush / Kensington Olympia leg and this was the part cancelled due to the Carpenders Park problem. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 June, 18:32, wrote:
On Jun 9, 4:58*pm, MIG wrote: On 9 June, 16:41, wrote: On 9 June, 14:49, MIG wrote: On 9 June, 14:40, wrote: On 9 June, 00:38, asdf wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Oh ang on though, if they used platform 1 at HotH, I think there may be a crossover. *Not sure if it isn't just a track crossing to/from the Metropolitan or if it leads to/from the up Chiltern track as well. I can't remember if this crossover can be used from Up departures from Platform 1 at Harrow. My memory tells me that there is no signal for this route. What I can't remember is if the crossover from the NB Fast to the Platform 1 just passes over the intervening Up line or whether there is pointwork in the Up line allowing access. There isn't pointwork - it's one of those things that I think is referred to as a diamond crossing. Thanks, I though it probably was, but couldn't remember. It can't be that simple though, because it has to allow for Metropolitan trains in both directions, doesn't it? *So there must be something from the up Chiltern to the Met as well as the diamond from the Met to the down Chiltern, even if nothing from platform 1 to the up Chiltern? Platform 1 is only accessible from the Down Chiltern and the NB Met fast, via the diamond crossing, heading north (to the NB Met fast), with no access heading south without a shunt. Platform 2 only has access to the Up Chiltern, heading south from the SB Met fast, or the NB Met fast heading north via the trailing crossover. There is no access to other Met line tracks (i.e. the both southbound, NB slow or the Uxbridge lines). Met line trains only use Platform 1 heading north, from the NB fast or platform 2 reversing from SB to NB. There are no other Met line possibilities, with the current layout.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah right, so you can't take the Met south through platform 2, I think you are saying, and it's electricked only for reversing back north. That seems a bit unbalanced given that you can go north through platform 1, but if that's the way it is ... *Hard to tell from diagrams. That's right. To go south to the Met from platform 2 would require crossing both northbound tracks, so all crossing moves happen at Harrow North Junction, where only the NB slow is crossed. On the other hand, using platform 1 for NB Met fast services takes only takes them across the SB Chiltern and gives extra platform capacity in the evening peak.- A bit late to go back to this one, but I got round to checking the right Quails. The Southern (most up-to-date) edition corresponds exactly to what you say, with the electrification not even extending from platform 2 as far back as the diamond. But the Western edition is very different, showing more electrification and difficult to interpret whether there's a crossover, because of the colours not quite lining up. I wonder if there has been a change in recent years or one there was a mistake? |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
On 9 June, 18:32, wrote: That's right. To go south to the Met from platform 2 would require crossing both northbound tracks, so all crossing moves happen at Harrow North Junction, where only the NB slow is crossed. On the other hand, using platform 1 for NB Met fast services takes only takes them across the SB Chiltern and gives extra platform capacity in the evening peak.- A bit late to go back to this one, but I got round to checking the right Quails. The Southern (most up-to-date) edition corresponds exactly to what you say, with the electrification not even extending from platform 2 as far back as the diamond. That is correct. There is no route SB from platform 2, other than up to Marylebone. Electrification ends at the south end of the platform. In practise, the only services that use P2 are terminating trains from the north, that then run back to Rickmansworth to stable. AFAIR that only actually consists of one evening service at around 20:15. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "asdf" wrote in message ... Actually, I neglected to mention that I was writing that about the DC line (though I bet the NLL wasn't pretty either). It wasn't (excuse me coming to this late). I was on the very crowded train scheduled to leave Gospel Oak for Clapham Junction around 0920 on Thursday. All trains through Gospel Oak seemed to be running around 6-10 minutes late just because of extra time at stations to handle the crowds. The driver announced that a freight train had been routed immediately in front of us and we had to wait at the platform until the freight train had cleared Hampstead Tunnel - that's past the next station and then some. I wonder whether that's a single block section or whether there's some other safety-related issue. So we were around 15 minutes late at Clapham, and at Willesden Junction in particular staff were stopping people from trying to board the train Martin |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 June, 20:50, MIG wrote:
On 9 June, 18:32, wrote: On Jun 9, 4:58*pm, MIG wrote: On 9 June, 16:41, wrote: On 9 June, 14:49, MIG wrote: On 9 June, 14:40, wrote: On 9 June, 00:38, asdf wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Oh ang on though, if they used platform 1 at HotH, I think there may be a crossover. *Not sure if it isn't just a track crossing to/from the Metropolitan or if it leads to/from the up Chiltern track as well. I can't remember if this crossover can be used from Up departures from Platform 1 at Harrow. My memory tells me that there is no signal for this route. What I can't remember is if the crossover from the NB Fast to the Platform 1 just passes over the intervening Up line or whether there is pointwork in the Up line allowing access. There isn't pointwork - it's one of those things that I think is referred to as a diamond crossing. Thanks, I though it probably was, but couldn't remember. It can't be that simple though, because it has to allow for Metropolitan trains in both directions, doesn't it? *So there must be something from the up Chiltern to the Met as well as the diamond from the Met to the down Chiltern, even if nothing from platform 1 to the up Chiltern? Platform 1 is only accessible from the Down Chiltern and the NB Met fast, via the diamond crossing, heading north (to the NB Met fast), with no access heading south without a shunt. Platform 2 only has access to the Up Chiltern, heading south from the SB Met fast, or the NB Met fast heading north via the trailing crossover. There is no access to other Met line tracks (i.e. the both southbound, NB slow or the Uxbridge lines). Met line trains only use Platform 1 heading north, from the NB fast or platform 2 reversing from SB to NB. There are no other Met line possibilities, with the current layout.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah right, so you can't take the Met south through platform 2, I think you are saying, and it's electricked only for reversing back north. That seems a bit unbalanced given that you can go north through platform 1, but if that's the way it is ... *Hard to tell from diagrams. That's right. To go south to the Met from platform 2 would require crossing both northbound tracks, so all crossing moves happen at Harrow North Junction, where only the NB slow is crossed. On the other hand, using platform 1 for NB Met fast services takes only takes them across the SB Chiltern and gives extra platform capacity in the evening peak.- A bit late to go back to this one, but I got round to checking the right Quails. *The Southern (most up-to-date) edition corresponds exactly to what you say, with the electrification not even extending from platform 2 as far back as the diamond. But the Western edition is very different, showing more electrification and difficult to interpret whether there's a crossover, because of the colours not quite lining up. *I wonder if there has been a change in recent years or one there was a mistake? There were quite a few mistakes introduced when Quail switched to colour and the Western version is definately wrong. I don't think that there have been any changes to the electrification on the 'Chiltern' platforms for many years, possibily not since the 1960s. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thur 5 Feb - London bus strike no. 2 (of possible 4) | London Transport | |||
Possible to buy a single Tube ticket / inboundary Travelcard milesaway from London? | London Transport | |||
The possible 'lager' strikes | London Transport | |||
The effects of a road congestion tax | London Transport | |||
still live possible chat | London Transport |