Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 8:25*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On Jun 6, 7:54*pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: On Jun 6, 6:14*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT), Mr Thant Speaking of incorrectly programmed Oyster machinery, last week I took a train from Stratford to Tottenham Hale to use the Victoria Line, but because I went straight to the tube gateline without first touching a validator on the NR platforms, I was charged £4 for the train journey. Grrr. Surely it's you who made the error? *You were exiting from the NR "side" of the OSI so needed to record an exit on the validator. You "entered" at the Vic Line and a failure to record your exit from NR got you the £4 charge. *I don't see how there is an Oyster failing here no matter how galling it is for you to have incurred a £4 charge. I've made the same mistake - I didn't think it was obvious that I'd have to touch out to leave the (ungated) platform, nor that I'd encounter a gateline to enter the tube. And even when I got to the gateline, I thought that the system would work out what I was doing. Perhaps I'm too used to Finsbury Park and Highbury & Islington. (I managed to get the extra charge refunded at a ticket office, as I'd otherwise reached the off-peak cap - but the unresolved journey still shows up on my journey history at ticket machines. Will that ever go away?) It does eventually. Don't worry about it! Though when was this? I didn't think LU ticket offices have been able to do such refunds for a long time. Thanks for providing a 'fresh' POV from the passenger's perspective with regards to Tottenham Hale. Whilst 'the system' is working properly, how this system works is far from clear to the passenger. I think it could do with being changed at this location. I'm afraid my mind was playing tricks with me on Saturday - it was actually Walthamstow Central where I changed for the tube (then went *to* Tottenham Hale). I don't use either station often, but IIRC the setup is similar: leaving the NR side, there's just a stand-alone reader, and then you encounter a gateline to get into the Victoria Line. I can't quite remember when this was, but I think it must have been before mid-March, because I can't find it in any recent journey histories. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 8, 7:10*pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: On Jun 6, 8:25*pm, Mizter T wrote: On Jun 6, 7:54*pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: [snip tale of touching-in at Tottenham Hale] I've made the same mistake - I didn't think it was obvious that I'd have to touch out to leave the (ungated) platform, nor that I'd encounter a gateline to enter the tube. And even when I got to the gateline, I thought that the system would work out what I was doing. Perhaps I'm too used to Finsbury Park and Highbury & Islington. (I managed to get the extra charge refunded at a ticket office, as I'd otherwise reached the off-peak cap - but the unresolved journey still shows up on my journey history at ticket machines. Will that ever go away?) It does eventually. Don't worry about it! Though when was this? I didn't think LU ticket offices have been able to do such refunds for a long time. Thanks for providing a 'fresh' POV from the passenger's perspective with regards to Tottenham Hale. Whilst 'the system' is working properly, how this system works is far from clear to the passenger. I think it could do with being changed at this location. I'm afraid my mind was playing tricks with me on Saturday - it was actually Walthamstow Central where I changed for the tube (then went *to* Tottenham Hale). I don't use either station often, but IIRC the setup is similar: leaving the NR side, there's just a stand-alone reader, and then you encounter a gateline to get into the Victoria Line. OK - different location, but same issue. Again, according to the spreadsheet of OSIs released by TfL, it is an out-of-station interchange between the NR and LU sides, so the system expects you to touch-out on the standalone reader on the NR platform before you then enter the LU station through the gates (and likewise having exited the LU gates it expects you to touch-in on the NR platform before you travel on NR). I can't help but think it could be helpful to be able to configure the gates so as to tolerate this behaviour, at least when entering through the gates into the LU station - though I can see why it might be desirable to require pax to touch-in going the other way (from LU to NR) on the readers on the NR platform before travelling on NR. I realise this would result in a somewhat lopsided situation, but it would kinda make sense from a passenger's perspective (along with explicit signage between the LU gates and the NR platforms that Oyster users need to touch-in again). The alternative is to just provide explicit and very obvious signage on the NR platforms at both Walthamstow Central *and* Tottenham Hale explaining to pax that they must touch-out/in on the standalone readers as well as on the gates when interchanging. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... I was using Oyster PAYG and I'd made several other bus and tube journeys during the day. I travelled on the Bakerloo from Piccadilly Circus to Wembley Central, getting to Wembley at about 1650, and went to collect my bag from a hotel near the stadium. I then needed to get back to central London so I caught Chiltern to Marylebone, touching back in at Wembley Stadium at about 1710. [snip] Anyone have any ideas? Did you touch out at Wembley Central? If you didn't then I can fully understand why a touch in at Wembley Stadium would, in fact, end your original journey from Picc Circus (as recorded on your card). I'm pretty sure I touched out at Wembley Central - though thinking about it now I went through the side gate which was left open, but I'm sure the reader beeped as I touched it. I didn't check what the screen said though... hmmm... I forgot to mention before, the RPI was talking about my Oyster being an 'old card', and that the software has been updated since then. It's one of the student ones with your photo on, about three years old I think - the student entitlement is expired now but I do still have a 16-25 Railcard linked to it. Was he talking rubbish or is that a possible cause? Mizter T, thanks for the suggestion downthread about getting my journey history (can't reply directly as stupid Outlook Express won't quote your message properly), I'll have another look though I think those are the steps I went through and it still said about needing auto-topup. James |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 8, 9:40*pm, "James Penton" wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote: I was using Oyster PAYG and I'd made several other bus and tube journeys during the day. I travelled on the Bakerloo from Piccadilly Circus to Wembley Central, getting to Wembley at about 1650, and went to collect my bag from a hotel near the stadium. I then needed to get back to central London so I caught Chiltern to Marylebone, touching back in at Wembley Stadium at about 1710. [snip] Anyone have any ideas? Did you touch out at Wembley Central? *If you didn't then I can fully understand why a touch in at Wembley Stadium would, in fact, end your original journey from Picc Circus (as recorded on your card). I'm pretty sure I touched out at Wembley Central - though thinking about it now I went through the side gate which was left open, but I'm sure the reader beeped as I touched it. I didn't check what the screen said though.... hmmm... Hmmm indeed! If this touch-out didn't register properly, then that would explain everything. Afraid I've never come across a situation where an Oyster card reader beeps in acknowledgement and yet doesn't properly interact with the card. By the by, do you know that there's an error beep as well as the normal 'everything's OK' beep - it's a double-beep at a higher pitch. The LCD screen is a bit hard to read unless you look at them very purposefully, but the other thing to look for is the light next to the "target" going green - if there's an error it goes red - meanwhile when it's just ready and waiting it's a continuous orange. I forgot to mention before, the RPI was talking about my Oyster being an 'old card', and that the software has been updated since then. It's one of the student ones with your photo on, about three years old I think - the student entitlement is expired now but I do still have a 16-25 Railcard linked to it. Was he talking rubbish or is that a possible cause? Sounds highly unlikely to me. The expired student element may have been a source of confusion in their mind I suppose - but expired student cards do just become normal cards. Mizter T, thanks for the suggestion downthread about getting my journey history (can't reply directly as stupid Outlook Express won't quote your message properly), I'll have another look though I think those are the steps I went through and it still said about needing auto-topup. Interesting - do give it another try. I suppose it's remotely possible it gets treated differently as an ex-student Oyster card, though I don't see why that would be. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster error - how does this happen | London Transport | |||
Oyster/UTS error code 76 | London Transport | |||
Bullying Oyster error codes | London Transport | |||
Error codes for Oyster cards | London Transport | |||
Interesting Oyster... [Error] | London Transport |