Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
....first off though, it's worth noting the improved offer from LU:
"LU made an improved offer of a four-year deal of 1.5% this year and then the inflation rate plus 0.5%; or a two-year deal of 1% now and inflation plus 0.5% in year two." See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8088708.stm I can understand that the rationale behind the union not wanting to sign a five year deal, as much may change in the next few years. But here's the offer of a two year deal - I find it difficult to see how they can turn their nose up at that. Of course I'd think LU would prefer them to opt for the four year deal as that takes it past the Olympics, but it seems they're willing to do a two year deal as well. Of course I don't know the details, so perhaps there's various things chucked in with the four year pay offer to spice it up somewhat over the two year pay offer. Anyway, leaving aside the brinkmanship I see from the splash on the front page of the TfL website that they've got a number of contingency plans up their sleeve should the strike go ahead - see the news release he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/11971.aspx There's several things of note... * Most strikingly Oyster PAYG "will be accepted on all National Rail journeys within Greater London on Wednesday and Thursday, just show your Oyster card at station gate lines". In practice I'm pretty sure this means that anyone who can flash an Oyster card can travel on NR services in London. It'll be interesting to see what is done where Oyster PAYG is accepted for part of a National Rail (NR) route, but not for all of it - specifically how unresolved journeys will be handled. A good example of this is someone's normal commute from Bounds Green to King's Cross on the Piccadilly line - instead they'll be able to travel from Bowes Park NR station to King's Cross on FCC's Great Northern service. Normally Oyster PAYG is only accepted on the GN service between Finsbury Park and King's Cross/ all stations to Moorgate. However on strike day they'd end up simply touching-out at King's Cross as they can't touch-in at Bowes Park, and likewise on their way home touching- in at KX and not being able to touch-out at Bowes Park. This could be dealt with by reconfiguring all the relevant Oyster readers (on gates and standalone validators) at NR stations to simply debit the amount for the minimum journey from that station, i.e. switch off the 'entry charge' system and revert to how things were before it was introduced, and also stop unresolved journeys breaking capping. At least this is what I'd do! If it happens I imagine it might possibly be more easily implemented on a network-wide basis, as opposed to trying to single out the relevant stations. Anyway, we shall see how that plays out. Regardless of the unresolved journey issue, passing Oyster PAYG across NR would certainly lead to a degree of confusion in the mind's of many passengers, given the "always touch-in, always touch-out" mantra that's been drilled into them! Are NR staff prepared for the questioning?! Looking at it more generally, TfL must be prepared to hand over some serious cash to the TOCs for effectively allowing free travel on the NR network (but shush, just make sure you don't phrase it like that!). * There will be "five escorted cycle rides", which will set off from their start points at 0745 - none of which are actually very far out of town, but I think it's often the final stretch into central London that puts people off cycling to work. This is being organised by the London Cycle Campaign - they've dubbed it "BikeTube(s)" and have a special website about it he http://www.biketube.org.uk/ The aforementioned website also has a load of other more general information about commuter cycling - all the sensible stuff like fix yer bike up, ride safely, plan your route etc. LCC are evidently trying to take this opportunity to convert more people over to cycling. * Also with regards to cycling, there'll be extra cycle parking places at five central London locations - if my sums are correct, there'll be 750 extra parking places at four locations plus 1,000 extra at the pre- existing London Bridge cycle park (it's unclear if this will cost or not - normally you've got to pay). Plus TfL reckon many business will provide space somewhere. * London Overground is apparently "operating as normal", so it seems TfL are confident that the LUL managed stations can stay open. ("Operating as normal" on the NLL of course means getting stuck behind a 'failed' freight train, or having a slow freight train sent out just in front of a passenger train.) * Extra river bus services will operate, including a "free peak shuttle" between London Eye - Westminster - Tower Bridge "every 10 minutes between 07:00-10:00 and 15:00-20:00 on both main strike days" i.e. Wednesday and Thursday. * There'll be marshalled taxi sharing from seven London termini stations. * Walking maps for central London will be handed out at major rail and bus stations and at "key Tube stations". So, all the fun of the fair. If it encourages some more people to 'discover' walking or cycling then perhaps there can be some good that comes from it all. Apols if the tenses got a bit confused above - that just reflects the uncertainty over whether the strike is going to happen or not. They keep you on your toes, the RMT, of that one can be sure. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 7:28*pm, Mizter T wrote:
Anyway, leaving aside the brinkmanship I see from the splash on the front page of the TfL website that they've got a number of contingency plans up their sleeve should the strike go ahead - see the news release hehttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/11971.aspx That's the 'In case of tube strike, break glass' bolt-on, as a friend just described it. I also got a text from TfL this evening letting me know about it, and directing me towards the website. I guess it's going ahead, then... I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. Oh well, can't have everything... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 7:44*pm, Martin Deutsch wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:28*pm, Mizter T wrote: Anyway, leaving aside the brinkmanship I see from the splash on the front page of the TfL website that they've got a number of contingency plans up their sleeve should the strike go ahead - see the news release he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/11971.aspx That's the 'In case of tube strike, break glass' bolt-on, as a friend just described it. I also got a text from TfL this evening letting me know about it, and directing me towards the website. I guess it's going ahead, then... Ha ha, very good. However it does seem rather more comprehensive than has been the case before - I'm thinking of the Metronet workers going on strike in September '07 (was that their only strike, I forget?), which shut down much of the network, though of course the Northern, Jubilee and most of the Piccadilly lines still ran. There wasn't any universal 'acceptance' (i.e. passing) of Oyster PAYG on NR when that happened, which is the most significant element of this contingency plan. So I'm kinda curious to know whether that weapon was in TfL's strike-breaking arsenal back then. I remember during all-network Tube strikes of the past there being temporary car parks that were set up in the Royal Parks, though maybe it was only in Hyde Park, I forget. Perhaps that that shows that times have changed a bit, what with the Mall playing host to a cycle park this time. I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. *Oh well, can't have everything... Yes, I tried that too (on a strike day)! I then I forgot to mention it in my spiel. Considering this special journey planner interface appears underneath the heading "Planning your alternative journey", it is perhaps a bit misleading. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message ... On Jun 8, 7:44 pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: On Jun 8, 7:28 pm, Mizter T wrote: Anyway, leaving aside the brinkmanship I see from the splash on the front page of the TfL website that they've got a number of contingency plans up their sleeve should the strike go ahead - see the news release he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/11971.aspx That's the 'In case of tube strike, break glass' bolt-on, as a friend just described it. I also got a text from TfL this evening letting me know about it, and directing me towards the website. I guess it's going ahead, then... Ha ha, very good. However it does seem rather more comprehensive than has been the case before - I'm thinking of the Metronet workers going on strike in September '07 (was that their only strike, I forget?), which shut down much of the network, though of course the Northern, Jubilee and most of the Piccadilly lines still ran. There wasn't any universal 'acceptance' (i.e. passing) of Oyster PAYG on NR when that happened, which is the most significant element of this contingency plan. So I'm kinda curious to know whether that weapon was in TfL's strike-breaking arsenal back then. I remember during all-network Tube strikes of the past there being temporary car parks that were set up in the Royal Parks, though maybe it was only in Hyde Park, I forget. Perhaps that that shows that times have changed a bit, what with the Mall playing host to a cycle park this time. I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. Oh well, can't have everything... Yes, I tried that too (on a strike day)! I then I forgot to mention it in my spiel. Considering this special journey planner interface appears underneath the heading "Planning your alternative journey", it is perhaps a bit misleading. So no lines will be running at all? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 8, 8:45*pm, wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On Jun 8, 7:44 pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: [snip] I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. Oh well, can't have everything... Yes, I tried that too (on a strike day)! I then I forgot to mention it in my spiel. Considering this special journey planner interface appears underneath the heading "Planning your alternative journey", it is perhaps a bit misleading. ----- So no lines will be running at all? If the strike happens, that's a possibility. It's RMT members who are going on strike, but other unions members (e.g. ASLEF) might nonetheless refuse to cross the picket lines. So it rather depends on how many people actually turn up to work. A limited service might possibly run on some lines, who knows... (P.S. Any chance you can fix your newsgroup program's broken quoting...) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message ... On Jun 8, 8:45 pm, wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On Jun 8, 7:44 pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: [snip] I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. Oh well, can't have everything... Yes, I tried that too (on a strike day)! I then I forgot to mention it in my spiel. Considering this special journey planner interface appears underneath the heading "Planning your alternative journey", it is perhaps a bit misleading. ----- So no lines will be running at all? If the strike happens, that's a possibility. It's RMT members who are going on strike, but other unions members (e.g. ASLEF) might nonetheless refuse to cross the picket lines. So it rather depends on how many people actually turn up to work. A limited service might possibly run on some lines, who knows... (P.S. Any chance you can fix your newsgroup program's broken quoting...) I am using Outlook Express not sure how to fix it or what you mean? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
"Mizter T" wrote in message ... (P.S. Any chance you can fix your newsgroup program's broken quoting...) I am using Outlook Express not sure how to fix it or what you mean? Try: Tools Options Send News Sending Format Plain Text Settings Indent the original text with when replying or forwarding |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... "Mizter T" wrote in message ... On Jun 8, 7:44 pm, Martin Deutsch wrote: On Jun 8, 7:28 pm, Mizter T wrote: Anyway, leaving aside the brinkmanship I see from the splash on the front page of the TfL website that they've got a number of contingency plans up their sleeve should the strike go ahead - see the news release he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/11971.aspx That's the 'In case of tube strike, break glass' bolt-on, as a friend just described it. I also got a text from TfL this evening letting me know about it, and directing me towards the website. I guess it's going ahead, then... Ha ha, very good. However it does seem rather more comprehensive than has been the case before - I'm thinking of the Metronet workers going on strike in September '07 (was that their only strike, I forget?), which shut down much of the network, though of course the Northern, Jubilee and most of the Piccadilly lines still ran. There wasn't any universal 'acceptance' (i.e. passing) of Oyster PAYG on NR when that happened, which is the most significant element of this contingency plan. So I'm kinda curious to know whether that weapon was in TfL's strike-breaking arsenal back then. I remember during all-network Tube strikes of the past there being temporary car parks that were set up in the Royal Parks, though maybe it was only in Hyde Park, I forget. Perhaps that that shows that times have changed a bit, what with the Mall playing host to a cycle park this time. I tried asking the 'special' journey planner earlier for a route home from work, and it cheerfully suggested that I took the tube, with a "planned engineering works are taking place" caveat on the first leg of each of the journeys. Oh well, can't have everything... Yes, I tried that too (on a strike day)! I then I forgot to mention it in my spiel. Considering this special journey planner interface appears underneath the heading "Planning your alternative journey", it is perhaps a bit misleading. So no lines will be running at all? What a laugh... Just checked my usual commute Kings X to Walthamstow Central for Weds morning and all I get is the usual tube info plus a little note telling me there's a strike. "Alternative journey" indeed! Not unless I grow wings. María |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
here's my tube strike contingency plan:
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/Brompton Guy -- http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
* Most strikingly Oyster PAYG "will be accepted on all National Rail journeys within Greater London on Wednesday and Thursday, just show your Oyster card at station gate lines". In practice I'm pretty sure this means that anyone who can flash an Oyster card can travel on NR services in London. I'm sure people will simply be waved through. What about journeys where one has to go through a set of PAYG readers at one end but not at the other - e.g. Forest Gate (where readers have been installed but don't appear to be operational) to Liverpool Street (where the readers are configured for PAYG for Stratford to Liverpool Street), for travellers substituting Upton Park to central London? Will these be automatically reversed or will the PAYG user have to chase it up - especially as they can't easily do so at Forest Gate. (Or could they nip down to Wanstead Park and touch out on the readers there?) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RMT strike ballot over ticket office closure plans | London Transport | |||
Strike contingency plan Walthamstow to Heathrow | London Transport | |||
London-focused rail strike contingency info (from BBC London) | London Transport | |||
LU strike and possible knock-on effects on NR / LO services [was:Tube strike] | London Transport | |||
GLA supports TfL plans for North London Railway | London Transport News |