Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote
On 4 Jul 2009 23:13:36 GMT, "Michael R N Dolbear" wrote: As I have previously noted, putting the touch out devices outside at bus stops rather than inside the bus doesn't require more advanced anything. Thus in Tfl terms a surcharge would be added on entry, say on all routes that go outside the zones. Boxes would be installed at all bus stops on line of route which would refund the surcharge on touching out if the stop is within the zones. Though it might create an issue where people for whatever reason (e.g. traffic conditions) end up leaving not at the stop. Same problem in Singapore, if discipline there allows doors to be opened when not at a stop. If you don't board another bus or your onwards route doesn't pass the stop before timeout it would cost you. On the wish list (Paul C's more advanced technology) how about mobile phones ? The smartcard and mobile would work out that you were no longer on a bus and your location was appropriate and give the refund. -- Mike D |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 5, 3:15*pm, (Neil Williams) wrote: On 4 Jul 2009 23:13:36 GMT, "Michael R N Dolbear" wrote: As I have previously noted, putting the touch out devices outside at bus stops rather than inside the bus doesn't require more advanced anything. Thus in Tfl terms a surcharge would be added on entry, say on all routes that go outside the zones. Boxes would be installed at all bus stops on line of route which would refund the surcharge on touching out if the stop is within the zones. Though it might create an issue where people for whatever reason (e.g. traffic conditions) end up leaving not at the stop. Which I do quite frequently - and I've joined a bus a few times when it hasn't been at the stop either. Plus there's hail and ride routes to consider too. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 5, 3:19*pm, (Neil Williams) wrote: On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:32:05 -0700 (PDT), ticketyboo wrote: Singapore is a small, tightly managed state. The way they do things largely doesn't translate to here, in particular touch out. I'm not sure that is true. *Making sure people touch out can be enforced by charging a maximum fare on boarding and refunding back on alighting, so there is a pecuniary disadvantage to not touching out There is, as Paul states, the potential issue of people touching out and not alighting, but that applies equally to a paper ticket system where you can buy the cheapest ticket and ride further, and can't be that much of a problem or bus companies would use more inspectors to catch people out doing it or move en-masse to flat fare, both of which Stagecoach and First appear to show no interest in. Nah, touch-out on buses in London would be a disaster, trust me! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ITSO on Prestige (IOP) (Was: Brian Souter gives the DfT...) | London Transport | |||
Test of UK's First NR Smartcard - SWT ITSO | London Transport | |||
Coffee & ITSO | London Transport | |||
ITSO & Oyster - the future | London Transport | |||
CLJ PAYG and Southern.. | London Transport |