Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Johnny Mo" wrote in message om... (Boltar) wrote in message om... Something I was wondering the other day , when the extension to Heathrow airport was built why didn't they re-extend the district line to Hounslow and beyond and divert the piccadilly to ealing? Why? Because district trains are much bigger and so they would have been much more room for passengers and their luggage rather than the pokey little tube trains on the picc. Was there a good reason for not doing this given the benefits it would have entailed for passengers with luggage? B2003 No one has yet noted there are legal differences between sub-surface stock ( district line) and tube stock (picc). To put a district train thru a single bore tunnel would require a whole new fleet. Tube (and WAGN class 313) need lengthwise evacuation, sub-surface stock does not. Johnny Mo I think the op meant when the track and tunnels were made, why not make them bigger and send the bigger surface stock to the airport. IIRC 313's have doors on the front of the cab. All underground stocks have steps or ramps to help detrain onto track level. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'Near miss' between District and Piccadilly line trains near EalingBdwy | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport | |||
Bus Replacement Service for District/Piccadilly Eng. Work. | London Transport | |||
Wimbledon branch of District line - why us? | London Transport | |||
Wimbledon branch of District line - why us? | London Transport |