Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 5:40*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 11 July, 17:28, Roy Badami wrote: Is there any statutory basis for this penalty? *The recent furore about penalties for unauthorised overdrafts has brought up an important point which is that consumer contracts essentially aren't allowed to contain provisions that permit the service provider to 'fine' the consumer - they can only charge the consumer the actual reasonable administrative costs incurred as a result of the consumer's breach of contract. TfL call it the "maximum cash fare", and the principle is that there's a discount from this for using the system correctly (touching in and out in the specified time, etc). Since the price of a single ticket is indeed £4, I can't imagine a challenge would be too successful. U Just to point out that the "maximum cash fare" is different when using National Rail and here £6.50 is charged upon entry to the system, with correction to the 'real' Oyster fare upon exit. This is less than the maximum cash fare for Watford Junction - Euston. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Unusual Oyster PAYG Problem | London Transport | |||
Spammer problem | London Transport | |||
Oyster - the online-bought top-up problem solved | London Transport | |||
Oyster Annual and Extension Tickets - a problem? | London Transport | |||
Bakerloo southbound track problem? | London Transport |