Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Aug 11, 4:28*pm, wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:21:30 +0100 "Recliner" wrote: wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:38:45 +0100 "Recliner" wrote: As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. *After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! Doesn't seem to be a problem for people in bendy buses when they go around corners. But bendies are wider, higher and much squarer than tube stock, so the I dunno , I reckon the height would be pretty close if you measure from rail level. And I suspect the width is pretty much the same. No way - or rather, I have to disagree with you on that one - I know bendies well, and there's *much* more space in the articulated bit of a bendy than there is in a tube carriage. don't move much relative to each other, unlike non-articulated carriages -- just look how much the adjacent carriage moves up and down when a tube train is bouncing along. Yes, there is that. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Mizter T wrote: On Aug 11, 4:28=A0pm, wrote: I dunno , I reckon the height would be pretty close if you measure from rail level. And I suspect the width is pretty much the same. No way - or rather, I have to disagree with you on that one - I know bendies well, and there's *much* more space in the articulated bit of a bendy than there is in a tube carriage. Hmm , well given the max width of a road vehicle is 2.5 metres and tube trains are 2.6 metres wide ... There may be more room on the inside of a bus because its not built so strong but external dimensions are another matter. B2003 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 18 Aug, 16:31, wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Mizter T wrote: On Aug 11, 4:28pm, wrote: I dunno , I reckon the height would be pretty close if you measure from rail level. And I suspect the width is pretty much the same. No way - or rather, I have to disagree with you on that one - I know bendies well, and there's *much* more space in the articulated bit of a bendy than there is in a tube carriage. Hmm , well given the max width of a road vehicle is 2.5 metres and tube trains are 2.6 metres wide ... There may be more room on the inside of a bus because its not built so strong but external dimensions are another matter. OK, the width of the articulated bit of a bendy bus is less than the width of a tube carriage - but we're talking more about the potential dimensions of the articulated bit of some hypothetical future tube train design. I'm not objecting to the basic concept, merely agreeing with others that it might be a bit of a tight fit - specifically I'm thinking about people bashing their heads on the low ceiling of an articulated connection. Unless you're very tall, that's simply not an issue w.r.t. the articulated section of a bendy bus. There was of course the "space train" concept for new Victoria line stock a while back that had walk-through carriage connections. It looked exciting, but evidently it wasn't pursued. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote in message
On 18 Aug, 16:31, wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Mizter T wrote: On Aug 11, 4:28pm, wrote: I dunno , I reckon the height would be pretty close if you measure from rail level. And I suspect the width is pretty much the same. No way - or rather, I have to disagree with you on that one - I know bendies well, and there's *much* more space in the articulated bit of a bendy than there is in a tube carriage. Hmm , well given the max width of a road vehicle is 2.5 metres and tube trains are 2.6 metres wide ... There may be more room on the inside of a bus because its not built so strong but external dimensions are another matter. OK, the width of the articulated bit of a bendy bus is less than the width of a tube carriage - but we're talking more about the potential dimensions of the articulated bit of some hypothetical future tube train design. I'm not objecting to the basic concept, merely agreeing with others that it might be a bit of a tight fit - specifically I'm thinking about people bashing their heads on the low ceiling of an articulated connection. Unless you're very tall, that's simply not an issue w.r.t. the articulated section of a bendy bus. There was of course the "space train" concept for new Victoria line stock a while back that had walk-through carriage connections. It looked exciting, but evidently it wasn't pursued. I seem to recall that the space train was articulated and had a low floor (thanks to small wheels), which makes open gangways less of a challenge in a tube train. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
Ian Jelf: Shameless Plug for Free Walk | London Transport | |||
31 Minutes to walk from Kings Cross to St. Pancreas - Is this true!? | London Transport | |||
TfL Journey Planner - how dare you walk, while we use your money to fill the streets with empty buses! | London Transport | |||
SWT Trains through East Putney today | London Transport |