London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 18th 09, 07:49 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,029
Default Overground

Paul Corfield wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:03:37 -0700 (PDT), EE507
wrote:

At least the 172s will provide an extra 6m train length. What is the
proposed seating layout? Is this
http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New%...0/DMU_172.html
correct in saying it will be 3+2?


I've not seen or read anything about the layout for GOBLIN other than
the link you provided. Given that LOROL removed some of the 3+2
seating on the 150s to create more space I'm a bit surprised to see
3+2 seating proposed for the 172s. Perhaps it will be limited in
scale to allow more standing space closer to the doors?


All I recall reading is that they will definitely not have the 378's 'tube
style' interior as they want to be able to lease them elsewhere in due
course. I'd presume (in view of the small numbers involved) that they might
just have whatever London Midland and Chiltern are getting...

Paul S




  #2   Report Post  
Old September 18th 09, 10:30 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,796
Default Overground

On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:49:52 +0100, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

All I recall reading is that they will definitely not have the 378's 'tube
style' interior as they want to be able to lease them elsewhere in due
course. I'd presume (in view of the small numbers involved) that they might
just have whatever London Midland and Chiltern are getting...


Surprised LM (or anybody else) are going for 3+2 in a 23m
almost-tilt-profile bodyshell. That'll be cramped.

(It works on the 323s only just, and only because they're 2.82m wide
rather than 2.7something of the Turbostars).

But, yes, I believe they are to be "off the shelf" because they'll
likely end up somewhere else once the line eventually gets
electrified.

Neil

--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the at to reply.
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 19th 09, 12:36 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 498
Default Overground

On Sep 18, 11:30*pm, (Neil Williams)
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:49:52 +0100, "Paul Scott"

wrote:
All I recall reading is that they will definitely not have the 378's 'tube
style' interior as they want to be able to lease them elsewhere in due
course. I'd presume (in view of the small numbers involved) that they might
just have whatever London Midland and Chiltern are getting...


Surprised LM (or anybody else) are going for 3+2 in a 23m
almost-tilt-profile bodyshell. *That'll be cramped.


The LM units are down to be 2+2 in the all the source I can find.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
London Overground Dave Arquati London Transport 56 September 12th 06 01:58 AM
Overground Network Website Simon Lee London Transport 0 December 29th 05 12:38 PM
Walking Overground woodman London Transport 2 March 30th 05 07:36 PM
The Overground network [email protected] London Transport 3 August 28th 04 12:19 AM
The Overground network Jonn Elledge London Transport 4 August 27th 04 05:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017