Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Miles Bader" wrote in message ... The problem was clueless and dogmatic '60s worship of modernity ("newer _must_ be better, there is no exception!") being used to justify bad architecture and planning, and the mindless destruction of anything not fitting the fad of the moment. -Miles Whereas the Victorians who built the Euston "Arch" were in no way clueless and dogmatic in the mindless destruction they wrought on most of the capital's existing vernacular buildings. Many of them going back 400 years or more in their determination to replace them with pastiche Roman and Greek temple style edifices and the like. In this case presumably in recognition of the importance which railways clearly played in the Classical world. How very fitting - nothing faddish about that then, at all. While many of those they didn't raze to the ground they "improved" or rebuilt in the original style, so at to confuse and bewilder those of subsequent generations with any interest in the subject. michael adams .... -- Sabbath, n. A weekly festival having its origin in the fact that God made the world in six days and was arrested on the seventh. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Euston not to be rebuilt | London Transport | |||
Euston not to be rebuilt | London Transport | |||
BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport |