Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been away from London for several months, but on my return (and
after Oyster had gone live) I've noticed that irritatingly my (traditional card / mag stripe) annual gold card now prompts an error at all the underground gates I've gone through - both entrance and exit gates - which means delay, and having to ask to be let through a gate by an operative waiving their Oyster card. Yet at main line rail terminals London Charing Cross and London Bridge there's been no problems at all with the gates. Is this an unintended consequence of Oyster? Or is something else the cause? Anyone else experiencing the same enhanced service? The gold card runs 'til next May, so I guess that's when I'll get an Oyster card ..... but having to put up with this hassle for another 5 or so months is a pain. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dominic Pinto wrote:
I've been away from London for several months, but on my return (and after Oyster had gone live) I've noticed that irritatingly my (traditional card / mag stripe) annual gold card now prompts an error at all the underground gates I've gone through - both entrance and exit gates - which means delay, and having to ask to be let through a gate by an operative waiving their Oyster card. Yet at main line rail terminals London Charing Cross and London Bridge there's been no problems at all with the gates. Is this an unintended consequence of Oyster? Or is something else the cause? Anyone else experiencing the same enhanced service? I have a Gold card and it works fine. Expires in the next few months. The gold card runs 'til next May, so I guess that's when I'll get an Oyster card ..... but having to put up with this hassle for another 5 or so months is a pain. It's probably just something on the ticket - some gates are more sensitive to these things than others. Just pop down to your home station and ask for a replacement. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Next time it happens - look for the error number on the gate, or ask the
operative what the number is. That would help us find out what is wrong. Alan "Dominic Pinto" wrote in message ... I've been away from London for several months, but on my return (and after Oyster had gone live) I've noticed that irritatingly my (traditional card / mag stripe) annual gold card now prompts an error at all the underground gates I've gone through - both entrance and exit gates - which means delay, and having to ask to be let through a gate by an operative waiving their Oyster card. Yet at main line rail terminals London Charing Cross and London Bridge there's been no problems at all with the gates. Is this an unintended consequence of Oyster? Or is something else the cause? Anyone else experiencing the same enhanced service? The gold card runs 'til next May, so I guess that's when I'll get an Oyster card ..... but having to put up with this hassle for another 5 or so months is a pain. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Paul Bowden" wrote in message ... Dominic Pinto wrote: It's probably just something on the ticket - some gates are more sensitive to these things than others. Just pop down to your home station and ask for a replacement. That does make sense, but there is another possibility. The Oyster card is tied to the Photocard number of the user, as is the paper ticket number. I suspect that LUL have stopped the use of the paper ticket in this case, except for the main London Terminal(s) it would normally be used at. It would prevent the use of what is effectively the same ticket by two different people - Revenue Protection. On a related note - my local Mainline station has not got the proximity readers required to interface with Oyster cards. I have asked a member real staff (not these contract guards that seem to think they own the railways) about it but they tell me that the station IS NOT going to get the readers, despite being in Z6. I am getting fed up with having to explain the concept of Oyster to these contract guards and the fact that cards do not go through readers, the fact that it is perfectly valid for use at that station and that it's their fault it can't be read, not mine. I have been asked to produce a proof of purchase, but as I renew on line that is easier said than done. What annoys me more is that the TOC for this line are happy to take their share of the London Travel "pot" but will do nothing to move with the times vis. Oyster. I dread to think what will happen when weeklies go "Oyster" later this year, that'll mean over half their customers have tickets that can't be read. RayB --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/2003 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC), "RayB"
wrote: (snipped) What annoys me more is that the TOC for this line are happy to take their share of the London Travel "pot" but will do nothing to move with the times vis. Oyster. I dread to think what will happen when weeklies go "Oyster" later this year, that'll mean over half their customers have tickets that can't be read. RayB It is my understanding that Oyster is an LT/TfL initiative which the mainline TOCs went along with. Whilst there is the significant likelhood of a financial payback on TfL services, mainline companies have less to gain. Especially as they have already invested in ticket gates and revenue protection staff since privatisation in order to shore up their farebox takings. Rob |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rob" _rjayjaycox_at_nildram_dot_co_dot_uk_nodot wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC), "RayB" wrote: (snipped) What annoys me more is that the TOC for this line are happy to take their share of the London Travel "pot" but will do nothing to move with the times vis. Oyster. I dread to think what will happen when weeklies go "Oyster" later this year, that'll mean over half their customers have tickets that can't be read. RayB It is my understanding that Oyster is an LT/TfL initiative which the mainline TOCs went along with. Whilst there is the significant likelhood of a financial payback on TfL services, mainline companies have less to gain. Especially as they have already invested in ticket gates and revenue protection staff since privatisation in order to shore up their farebox takings. Rob Overheard a fellow passenger yapping to a friend on SWT a few weeks ago: 'I'm surprised others haven't caught onto this Oyster scam yet. You only have to pay for zone 1 but the checkers at Waterloo can't tell'. So already the fare evaders have cottoned onto this. The TOC's better get their skates on and buy electronic readers soon or they'll be paying for checkers and still lose revenue...... Colin |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC), "RayB"
wrote: The Oyster card is tied to the Photocard number of the user, as is the paper ticket number. I suspect that LUL have stopped the use of the paper ticket in this case, except for the main London Terminal(s) it would normally be used at. Why would they do this to a valid paper ticket? It would prevent the use of what is effectively the same ticket by two different people - Revenue Protection. But he only has one ticket? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , K
writes On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC), "RayB" wrote: The Oyster card is tied to the Photocard number of the user, as is the paper ticket number. I suspect that LUL have stopped the use of the paper ticket in this case, except for the main London Terminal(s) it would normally be used at. Why would they do this to a valid paper ticket? It would prevent the use of what is effectively the same ticket by two different people - Revenue Protection. But he only has one ticket? You may be interested to know that a Pre Pay Oyster (obviously one that isn't also holding any sort of season ticket) will be completely transferable; as an unvalidated carnet is now. -- Kat |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kat" wrote in message ... In message , K writes On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC), "RayB" wrote: The Oyster card is tied to the Photocard number of the user, as is the paper ticket number. I suspect that LUL have stopped the use of the paper ticket in this case, except for the main London Terminal(s) it would normally be used at. Why would they do this to a valid paper ticket? It would prevent the use of what is effectively the same ticket by two different people - Revenue Protection. But he only has one ticket? You may be interested to know that a Pre Pay Oyster (obviously one that isn't also holding any sort of season ticket) will be completely transferable; as an unvalidated carnet is now. I take it (or hope) that the pre pay Oyster is scheduled for release before the fares change in January, given that there are discounted fares available on Oyster? Speaking of which, whose idea was the flat £1.80 single fare to outside Z1 at weekends? Genius. It'll certainly encourage me to use the tube at weekends. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anger as CJB starts three new threads about one issue... | London Transport | |||
ELL newsletter - issue 9 | London Transport | |||
TfL will get powers to issue ASBOs | London Transport | |||
Oyster top-up and travelcard issue at National Rail stations | London Transport |